Economic Burden of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in European Union: Results from a Systematic Review of Literature.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Alisha Saeed, Zermina Tasleem, Sohail Ayaz Muhammad, Anees Ur Rehman, Shahid Shah, Qurratul Ain Jamil, Hajra Siddiqui, Hidayah Karuniawati, Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi
{"title":"Economic Burden of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in European Union: Results from a Systematic Review of Literature.","authors":"Alisha Saeed, Zermina Tasleem, Sohail Ayaz Muhammad, Anees Ur Rehman, Shahid Shah, Qurratul Ain Jamil, Hajra Siddiqui, Hidayah Karuniawati, Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi","doi":"10.1007/s41669-024-00554-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous malignancy whose management is associated with considerable healthcare resource utilization and high expenditures because of recurrent and extended hospitalizations, multiple outpatient visits, and a wide range of supportive care. Modern therapies with improved safety profiles may assist in reducing healthcare costs; however, they are usually more expensive than standard chemotherapies. Few studies have addressed the expenses and burden of AML. Most of these studies were conducted in the USA. Very little research is available from the European Union (EU).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the economic impact of AML and determine the major cost-driving factors for its treatment in the EU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review is in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies on the economic impact of AML in various countries of the EU, published before April 15, 2024. Original studies investigating direct costs including expenses for treatment and healthcare services, or resource utilization for AML management were included. The systematic review excluded commentaries, editorials, and pharmacoeconomic modeling studies. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment, and the third reviewer resolved disagreements. We employed the Allison Larg Cost-of-Illness Studies evaluation checklist to assess the risk of bias. The mean cost per patient for induction, consolidation, and transplantation was calculated, and the results were converted into 2024 Euros.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria, with the sample size of AML patients ranging from 12 to 39,568. The calculated per-patient direct costs of induction chemotherapy in Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy were €92,378, €77,844, €61,643, €46,113, and €20,254, respectively. The mean per-patient direct cost of consolidation chemotherapy in the Netherlands and Germany was €42,137, and €32,220, respectively. The mean per-patient direct costs of transplantation in Sweden, Austria, France, Netherlands, and Spain were €192,628, €188,453, €132,352, €122,760, and €47,968, respectively. The cost-driving factors associated with AML treatment were inpatient hospitalization and medication costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AML seems to incur substantial direct economic expenses. Reducing the days of hospitalization can significantly decrease the economic burden of AML in the European Union. Moreover, there is a necessity for studies that comprehensively evaluate the economic implications, particularly concerning total and indirect costs.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Registered in PROSPERO under the registration number 'CRD42024537725'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00554-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous malignancy whose management is associated with considerable healthcare resource utilization and high expenditures because of recurrent and extended hospitalizations, multiple outpatient visits, and a wide range of supportive care. Modern therapies with improved safety profiles may assist in reducing healthcare costs; however, they are usually more expensive than standard chemotherapies. Few studies have addressed the expenses and burden of AML. Most of these studies were conducted in the USA. Very little research is available from the European Union (EU).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the economic impact of AML and determine the major cost-driving factors for its treatment in the EU.

Methods: This systematic review is in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies on the economic impact of AML in various countries of the EU, published before April 15, 2024. Original studies investigating direct costs including expenses for treatment and healthcare services, or resource utilization for AML management were included. The systematic review excluded commentaries, editorials, and pharmacoeconomic modeling studies. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment, and the third reviewer resolved disagreements. We employed the Allison Larg Cost-of-Illness Studies evaluation checklist to assess the risk of bias. The mean cost per patient for induction, consolidation, and transplantation was calculated, and the results were converted into 2024 Euros.

Results: Twenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria, with the sample size of AML patients ranging from 12 to 39,568. The calculated per-patient direct costs of induction chemotherapy in Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy were €92,378, €77,844, €61,643, €46,113, and €20,254, respectively. The mean per-patient direct cost of consolidation chemotherapy in the Netherlands and Germany was €42,137, and €32,220, respectively. The mean per-patient direct costs of transplantation in Sweden, Austria, France, Netherlands, and Spain were €192,628, €188,453, €132,352, €122,760, and €47,968, respectively. The cost-driving factors associated with AML treatment were inpatient hospitalization and medication costs.

Conclusion: AML seems to incur substantial direct economic expenses. Reducing the days of hospitalization can significantly decrease the economic burden of AML in the European Union. Moreover, there is a necessity for studies that comprehensively evaluate the economic implications, particularly concerning total and indirect costs.

Registration: Registered in PROSPERO under the registration number 'CRD42024537725'.

欧盟急性髓性白血病的经济负担:来自文献系统综述的结果。
背景:急性髓性白血病(AML)是一种异质性恶性肿瘤,其治疗需要大量的医疗资源利用和高额支出,因为患者需要反复和长期住院、多次门诊和广泛的支持治疗。安全性更高的现代疗法可能有助于降低医疗成本;然而,它们通常比标准化疗更昂贵。很少有研究涉及AML的费用和负担。这些研究大多是在美国进行的。来自欧盟(EU)的研究很少。目的:本研究的目的是评估AML的经济影响,并确定欧盟治疗AML的主要成本驱动因素。方法:本系统综述按照PRISMA指南进行。利用PubMed、Embase、ScienceDirect、SCOPUS和b谷歌Scholar数据库进行系统检索,确定2024年4月15日前发表的欧盟各国反洗钱经济影响相关研究。包括调查直接成本的原始研究,包括治疗和保健服务费用,或AML管理的资源利用。系统评价排除了评论、社论和药物经济学模型研究。两名审稿人独立进行数据提取和质量评估,第三名审稿人解决分歧。我们采用艾利森大型疾病成本研究评估清单来评估偏倚风险。计算每位患者诱导、巩固和移植的平均费用,并将结果转换为2024欧元。结果:28项研究符合我们的纳入标准,AML患者的样本量从12到39,568不等。在西班牙、法国、荷兰、德国和意大利,诱导化疗的人均直接费用分别为92378欧元、77844欧元、61643欧元、46113欧元和20254欧元。在荷兰和德国,巩固化疗的平均每位患者直接费用分别为42,137欧元和32,220欧元。在瑞典、奥地利、法国、荷兰和西班牙,移植的平均每位患者直接费用分别为192,628欧元、188,453欧元、132,352欧元、122,760欧元和47,968欧元。与AML治疗相关的成本驱动因素是住院和药物费用。结论:AML似乎会产生大量的直接经济费用。减少住院天数可以显著减轻欧盟AML的经济负担。此外,有必要进行研究,全面评价所涉经济问题,特别是总费用和间接费用。注册:在普洛斯彼罗注册,注册号为CRD42024537725。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信