Erica S Spatz, D August Oddleifson, Jehanzeb Kayani, Kensey L Gosch, Philip G Jones, Rushabh H Doshi, Thomas M Maddox, Nihar R Desai
{"title":"Accountable Care Organization Participation and Cardiovascular Care Quality.","authors":"Erica S Spatz, D August Oddleifson, Jehanzeb Kayani, Kensey L Gosch, Philip G Jones, Rushabh H Doshi, Thomas M Maddox, Nihar R Desai","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) was introduced in 2012 to improve care quality and lower costs to Medicare. Under this program, accountable care organizations (ACOs) assumed responsibility for costs and care quality for a group of Medicare beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare changes in quality measures for patients at outpatient cardiology practices before and after their participation in a Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This pre-post cohort study comparing quality prior to and after ACO participation evaluated the MSSP at 83 ACO outpatient cardiology practices compared with 332 non-ACO-participating cardiology practices, adjusted for secular trends, using 15 performance measures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence) Registry from January 1, 2013, through March 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from 2022 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Outpatient cardiology practice participation in the MSSP, which allows ACOs to share in the savings if predetermined cost targets are met, with payments adjusted based on a quality performance score.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary end points included 15 quality measures for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2 390 244 patients (1 273 615 [53.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [17.7] years) were cared for by 83 ACO practices, and 5 415 880 patients (2 810 204 [51.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [16.3] years) were cared for by 332 non-ACO practices. Outpatient cardiology practice participation in an MSSP ACO was not associated with differential changes in various performance measures for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. There were no differential changes in the odds of β-blocker prescription, blood pressure control, antiplatelet prescription, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescription, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) profiles, or smoking cessation for coronary artery disease; left ventricular assessment, β-blocker prescription, ACEI or ARB prescription, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator use for heart failure; anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation; or blood pressure control for hypertension. Exploratory analyses extending follow-up to 24 months revealed an increase in β-blocker use for heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.49; P = .03) and a decline in LDL profiles less than 100 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259; aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.999; P = .049). Among a subset of traditional Medicare patients, there was an increase in implantable cardioverter defibrillator use by 12 months (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12-2.45; P = .01) following ACO participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Participation in an MSSP ACO was not found to be associated with early improvement in quality measures at outpatient cardiology practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) was introduced in 2012 to improve care quality and lower costs to Medicare. Under this program, accountable care organizations (ACOs) assumed responsibility for costs and care quality for a group of Medicare beneficiaries.
Objective: To compare changes in quality measures for patients at outpatient cardiology practices before and after their participation in a Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO.
Design, setting, and participants: This pre-post cohort study comparing quality prior to and after ACO participation evaluated the MSSP at 83 ACO outpatient cardiology practices compared with 332 non-ACO-participating cardiology practices, adjusted for secular trends, using 15 performance measures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence) Registry from January 1, 2013, through March 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from 2022 to 2025.
Exposures: Outpatient cardiology practice participation in the MSSP, which allows ACOs to share in the savings if predetermined cost targets are met, with payments adjusted based on a quality performance score.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary end points included 15 quality measures for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension.
Results: During the study period, 2 390 244 patients (1 273 615 [53.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [17.7] years) were cared for by 83 ACO practices, and 5 415 880 patients (2 810 204 [51.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [16.3] years) were cared for by 332 non-ACO practices. Outpatient cardiology practice participation in an MSSP ACO was not associated with differential changes in various performance measures for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. There were no differential changes in the odds of β-blocker prescription, blood pressure control, antiplatelet prescription, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescription, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) profiles, or smoking cessation for coronary artery disease; left ventricular assessment, β-blocker prescription, ACEI or ARB prescription, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator use for heart failure; anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation; or blood pressure control for hypertension. Exploratory analyses extending follow-up to 24 months revealed an increase in β-blocker use for heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.49; P = .03) and a decline in LDL profiles less than 100 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259; aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.999; P = .049). Among a subset of traditional Medicare patients, there was an increase in implantable cardioverter defibrillator use by 12 months (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12-2.45; P = .01) following ACO participation.
Conclusions and relevance: Participation in an MSSP ACO was not found to be associated with early improvement in quality measures at outpatient cardiology practices.
JAMA cardiologyMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍:
JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program.
Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.