Comparative Analysis of Serum Magnesium Ion Levels Using Three Measurement Methods: Spectrophotometry, Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma With Optical Emission Spectrophotometry.

IF 1.5 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ianc/8853568
Raja Iqbal Mulya Harahap, Intanri Kurniati, Nida Suraya, Tiene Rostini, Bejo Ropii, Maulidwina Bethasari
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Serum Magnesium Ion Levels Using Three Measurement Methods: Spectrophotometry, Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma With Optical Emission Spectrophotometry.","authors":"Raja Iqbal Mulya Harahap, Intanri Kurniati, Nida Suraya, Tiene Rostini, Bejo Ropii, Maulidwina Bethasari","doi":"10.1155/ianc/8853568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnesium is a cation that plays as an important cofactor in various enzymatic reactions. It is the fourth most abundant cation in the body after sodium, potassium, and calcium. There are various magnesium measurement methods available such as spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry. These measurement methods have various advantages and disadvantages in measuring magnesium levels in serum. This study aimed to compare the magnesium measurement results by using three different methods. A total of 221 samples were examined for magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods. The results were then grouped into hypomagnesemia, noromagnesemia, and hypermagnesemia according to normal values. The mean and standard deviation were calculated and compared across three different methods. The mean and standard deviation of serum magnesium ion levels measured using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods were 1.84 ± 0.43, 1.86 ± 0.43, and 1.85 ± 0.43 (mg/dL), respectively. There were no significant differences (<i>p</i> value > 0.05) in serum magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry measurement methods, indicating similar reliability among the methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":13888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8853568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ianc/8853568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnesium is a cation that plays as an important cofactor in various enzymatic reactions. It is the fourth most abundant cation in the body after sodium, potassium, and calcium. There are various magnesium measurement methods available such as spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry. These measurement methods have various advantages and disadvantages in measuring magnesium levels in serum. This study aimed to compare the magnesium measurement results by using three different methods. A total of 221 samples were examined for magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods. The results were then grouped into hypomagnesemia, noromagnesemia, and hypermagnesemia according to normal values. The mean and standard deviation were calculated and compared across three different methods. The mean and standard deviation of serum magnesium ion levels measured using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods were 1.84 ± 0.43, 1.86 ± 0.43, and 1.85 ± 0.43 (mg/dL), respectively. There were no significant differences (p value > 0.05) in serum magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry measurement methods, indicating similar reliability among the methods.

分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体光学发射分光光度法测定血清镁离子水平的比较分析。
镁是一种阳离子,在各种酶促反应中起着重要的辅助因子作用。它是人体中含量第四丰富的阳离子,仅次于钠、钾和钙。镁的测量方法有分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法、电感耦合等离子体光学发射分光光度法等。这些测量方法在测定血清镁水平时各有优缺点。本研究旨在比较三种不同方法测定镁的结果。采用分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体光学发射分光光度法检测了221份样品的镁含量。然后根据正常值将结果分为低镁血症、低镁血症和高镁血症。通过三种不同的方法计算和比较平均值和标准差。分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体光学发射分光光度法测定血清镁离子水平的平均值和标准差分别为1.84±0.43、1.86±0.43和1.85±0.43 (mg/dL)。分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体光学发射分光光度法测定血清镁水平差异无统计学意义(p值> 0.05),表明三种方法的可靠性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: International Journal of Analytical Chemistry publishes original research articles that report new experimental results and methods, especially in relation to important analytes, difficult matrices, and topical samples. Investigations may be fundamental, or else related to specific applications; examples being biological, environmental and food testing, and analysis in chemical synthesis and materials processing. As well as original research, the International Journal of Analytical Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信