Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hideki Mori, Kazumi Yamasaki, Yusuke Saishoji, Yuichi Torisu, Takahiro Mori, Yuki Nagai, Yasumori Izumi
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Hideki Mori, Kazumi Yamasaki, Yusuke Saishoji, Yuichi Torisu, Takahiro Mori, Yuki Nagai, Yasumori Izumi","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute appendicitis requires timely diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of tongue examination in making this diagnosis has not been established. This study investigates whether the Tongue Coating Index (TCI), a validated measure of tongue coating, can aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study (1 September 2018-31 December 2020) at a single Japanese hospital. Adults (≥20 years) with suspected acute appendicitis, presenting to either the emergency department or general outpatient clinic, were enrolled. Tongue images were taken at presentation; two independent examiners-unrelated to clinical care and blinded to patient data-later scored these images using the TCI. A composite reference standard (clinical findings, imaging, histopathology, follow-up) was used to confirm appendicitis. We compared the TCI's diagnostic performance with the Alvarado score and its components using C-index, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 145 included patients, 69 (47.6%) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The TCI demonstrated comparable discriminative ability (C-index AUC 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.71) to that of the Alvarado score (0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). Of Alvarado score components, migration of pain had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.71), anorexia 0.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.66) and tenderness in the right lower quadrant 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60). At a cut-off of 3, the TCI demonstrated high sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 88% to 98%) but low specificity of 21% (95% CI, 13% to 32%). Conversely, at a cut-off of 10, the TCI showed increased specificity of 83% (95% CI, 73% to 90%) but reduced sensitivity of 29% (95% CI, 20% to 41%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TCI showed comparable diagnostic performance to the Alvarado score and its individual components. TCI may potentially serve as an additional non-invasive indicator for diagnosing or ruling out acute appendicitis. Further research is essential to validate its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis requires timely diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of tongue examination in making this diagnosis has not been established. This study investigates whether the Tongue Coating Index (TCI), a validated measure of tongue coating, can aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study (1 September 2018-31 December 2020) at a single Japanese hospital. Adults (≥20 years) with suspected acute appendicitis, presenting to either the emergency department or general outpatient clinic, were enrolled. Tongue images were taken at presentation; two independent examiners-unrelated to clinical care and blinded to patient data-later scored these images using the TCI. A composite reference standard (clinical findings, imaging, histopathology, follow-up) was used to confirm appendicitis. We compared the TCI's diagnostic performance with the Alvarado score and its components using C-index, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Of 145 included patients, 69 (47.6%) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The TCI demonstrated comparable discriminative ability (C-index AUC 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.71) to that of the Alvarado score (0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). Of Alvarado score components, migration of pain had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.71), anorexia 0.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.66) and tenderness in the right lower quadrant 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60). At a cut-off of 3, the TCI demonstrated high sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 88% to 98%) but low specificity of 21% (95% CI, 13% to 32%). Conversely, at a cut-off of 10, the TCI showed increased specificity of 83% (95% CI, 73% to 90%) but reduced sensitivity of 29% (95% CI, 20% to 41%).

Conclusion: The TCI showed comparable diagnostic performance to the Alvarado score and its individual components. TCI may potentially serve as an additional non-invasive indicator for diagnosing or ruling out acute appendicitis. Further research is essential to validate its clinical utility.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信