Real-world data analysis of topotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or CycloPhosphamide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Huihui Chen, Guobiao Zhuang, Shihao Hong, Jing Wu
{"title":"Real-world data analysis of topotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or CycloPhosphamide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Huihui Chen, Guobiao Zhuang, Shihao Hong, Jing Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The main purpose of this study is to observe and detect adverse reactions to the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, to learn more about possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to help doctors make the right medication decisions and treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adverse event signals were detected and quantified using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System using reporting ratios, proportions of reports (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Networks (BCPN), and empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare adverse events associated with topotecan alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of FAERS data revealed a total of 1,789 primary suspected adverse events (PS AEs) linked to topotecan. The Weibull shape parameter (β) for females was lower than for males across all age groups, indicating a potentially higher susceptibility to the adverse effects of topotecan in female patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proved several expected and new adverse drug reactions associated with the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab, and cyclophosphamide. While some ADRs, such as neutropenia and anemia, align with the known adverse profile of topotecan, the detection of novel signals, including potential gender-based differences in drug response, warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2488240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The main purpose of this study is to observe and detect adverse reactions to the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, to learn more about possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to help doctors make the right medication decisions and treatment plans.

Research design and methods: Adverse event signals were detected and quantified using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System using reporting ratios, proportions of reports (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Networks (BCPN), and empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare adverse events associated with topotecan alone.

Results: The analysis of FAERS data revealed a total of 1,789 primary suspected adverse events (PS AEs) linked to topotecan. The Weibull shape parameter (β) for females was lower than for males across all age groups, indicating a potentially higher susceptibility to the adverse effects of topotecan in female patients.

Conclusions: This study proved several expected and new adverse drug reactions associated with the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab, and cyclophosphamide. While some ADRs, such as neutropenia and anemia, align with the known adverse profile of topotecan, the detection of novel signals, including potential gender-based differences in drug response, warrants further investigation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信