Analysis of diroximel fumarate data for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis using related adverse events from the FDA adverse reporting system.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jing-Ya Yang, Sheng-Zhu Sun, Yi-Yan Sun, Tian-Qi Zuo, Xiao-Tong Li, Lei-Yong Zhao, Hong-Yun Wu, Wei Peng
{"title":"Analysis of diroximel fumarate data for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis using related adverse events from the FDA adverse reporting system.","authors":"Jing-Ya Yang, Sheng-Zhu Sun, Yi-Yan Sun, Tian-Qi Zuo, Xiao-Tong Li, Lei-Yong Zhao, Hong-Yun Wu, Wei Peng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). This study comprehensively analyzed the adverse events (AEs) associated with DRF for treating RMS based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study collected data on AEs associated with DRF treatment of RMS from the FAERS database between 2019 and 2024. We used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study collected 7,944,554 AE reports, of which 7,868 were associated with DRF. A total of 120 preferred terms (PTs) were included in the analysis, relating to 27 system organ classes (SOCs). This study identified several clinically significant new potential AEs, including decreased immune responsiveness (<i>n</i> = 26, ROR 4.45, PRR 4.45, IC 2.15, EBGM 4.43), female breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 50, ROR 4.07, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.05), transient blindness (<i>n</i> = 19, ROR 7.27, PRR 7.26, IC 2.85, EBGM 7.21) and others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified several potentially important AEs that were not mentioned in the DRF instructions. However, further epidemiologic studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2488318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). This study comprehensively analyzed the adverse events (AEs) associated with DRF for treating RMS based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Research design and methods: This study collected data on AEs associated with DRF treatment of RMS from the FAERS database between 2019 and 2024. We used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) for signal detection.

Results: This study collected 7,944,554 AE reports, of which 7,868 were associated with DRF. A total of 120 preferred terms (PTs) were included in the analysis, relating to 27 system organ classes (SOCs). This study identified several clinically significant new potential AEs, including decreased immune responsiveness (n = 26, ROR 4.45, PRR 4.45, IC 2.15, EBGM 4.43), female breast cancer (n = 50, ROR 4.07, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.05), transient blindness (n = 19, ROR 7.27, PRR 7.26, IC 2.85, EBGM 7.21) and others.

Conclusions: Our study identified several potentially important AEs that were not mentioned in the DRF instructions. However, further epidemiologic studies are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信