Assessment of antiseizure medication adherence based on postmortem toxicology and claimed prescriptions in cases of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1111/epi.18354
Marie Kroman Palsøe, Carl Johann Hansen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Kristian Linnet, Marius Kløvgaard, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Jytte Banner
{"title":"Assessment of antiseizure medication adherence based on postmortem toxicology and claimed prescriptions in cases of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.","authors":"Marie Kroman Palsøe, Carl Johann Hansen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Kristian Linnet, Marius Kløvgaard, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Jytte Banner","doi":"10.1111/epi.18354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with epilepsy are at a higher risk of dying suddenly and without explanation, known as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Seizures are a risk factor for SUDEP, and nonadherence to antiseizure medication (ASM) increases this risk. We aimed to assess adherence to ASMs at the time of death among young SUDEP cases by comparing prescription claims with postmortem toxicology at an individual level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all forensically autopsied SUDEP cases by assessing autopsy reports, toxicology reports, and Danish health registries from a previously identified nationwide population of sudden unexplained deaths in Denmark. We included cases aged 1-35 and 36-49 years between 2000-2019 and 2007-2019, respectively. We assessed adherence to ASMs by examining discrepancies or consistencies between any register-based claimed prescriptions and postmortem toxicology findings, resulting in four possible outcomes: evidence of adherence, nonadherence, nontreatment or undertreatment, and nonprescribed medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 477 sudden unexplained deaths, 84 (18%) were identified as SUDEP. Among the SUDEP cases, 73 (87%) claimed ASMs before death and 67 (80%) had ingested ASM according to postmortem findings. Evidence of nonadherence was found in 16 (19%) SUDEP cases, constituting 22% (n = 16/73) of SUDEP cases who claimed ASM before death. Adherence was observed in 53 SUDEP cases (63%), comprising 73% (n = 53/73) of SUDEP cases who claimed ASM before death. Nonadherent SUDEP cases tended toward a higher prevalence of psychiatric diseases when compared with the remaining SUDEP cases.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>By uniquely matching register-based prescription data with postmortem toxicology findings, we ascertained that 73% of SUDEP cases adhered to their claimed ASM, underscoring the necessity for continued vigilance in seizure management. However, improving medication adherence may possess preventive potential for SUDEP, as 22% exhibited nonadherence to their claimed ASM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Individuals with epilepsy are at a higher risk of dying suddenly and without explanation, known as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Seizures are a risk factor for SUDEP, and nonadherence to antiseizure medication (ASM) increases this risk. We aimed to assess adherence to ASMs at the time of death among young SUDEP cases by comparing prescription claims with postmortem toxicology at an individual level.

Methods: We identified all forensically autopsied SUDEP cases by assessing autopsy reports, toxicology reports, and Danish health registries from a previously identified nationwide population of sudden unexplained deaths in Denmark. We included cases aged 1-35 and 36-49 years between 2000-2019 and 2007-2019, respectively. We assessed adherence to ASMs by examining discrepancies or consistencies between any register-based claimed prescriptions and postmortem toxicology findings, resulting in four possible outcomes: evidence of adherence, nonadherence, nontreatment or undertreatment, and nonprescribed medication.

Results: Of 477 sudden unexplained deaths, 84 (18%) were identified as SUDEP. Among the SUDEP cases, 73 (87%) claimed ASMs before death and 67 (80%) had ingested ASM according to postmortem findings. Evidence of nonadherence was found in 16 (19%) SUDEP cases, constituting 22% (n = 16/73) of SUDEP cases who claimed ASM before death. Adherence was observed in 53 SUDEP cases (63%), comprising 73% (n = 53/73) of SUDEP cases who claimed ASM before death. Nonadherent SUDEP cases tended toward a higher prevalence of psychiatric diseases when compared with the remaining SUDEP cases.

Significance: By uniquely matching register-based prescription data with postmortem toxicology findings, we ascertained that 73% of SUDEP cases adhered to their claimed ASM, underscoring the necessity for continued vigilance in seizure management. However, improving medication adherence may possess preventive potential for SUDEP, as 22% exhibited nonadherence to their claimed ASM.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信