"Healthcare Doesn't Care": A Mixed-Methods Study on Healthcare Stigma and PrEP Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rodman Turpin, Aaron D Camp, C J Mandell, Rochelle Davidson Mhonde, Julia Mandeville, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo
{"title":"\"Healthcare Doesn't Care\": A Mixed-Methods Study on Healthcare Stigma and PrEP Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men.","authors":"Rodman Turpin, Aaron D Camp, C J Mandell, Rochelle Davidson Mhonde, Julia Mandeville, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo","doi":"10.1177/08901171251330710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a critical tool for HIV-prevention, yet PrEP uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is relatively low, despite greater HIV vulnerability. Stigma in healthcare settings can be a substantial barrier to PrEP use among BSMM, with implications for the HIV epidemic. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to assess quantitative relationships between anticipated healthcare stigma and reduced PrEP use among BSMM, and qualitatively explore stigmatizing experiences within healthcare settings among this population.MethodsWe utilized 2 data sources. First, cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (n = 151) was collected in late 2020 in the United States. We tested for associations between healthcare stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (n = 23) from this sample in the D.C. metropolitan area for qualitative interviews starting in 2022; we used thematic analysis to investigate forms of experienced and anticipated healthcare stigma related to PrEP use.ResultsWe found 82% lower PrEP use associated with an interquartile range increase in anticipated healthcare stigma after adjustment (aPR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.59). Subsequently, our qualitative investigation revealed that identity-specific stigma, negative socioeconomic assumptions, and assumptions of sexual risk were prevalent themes in the healthcare stigmatization experienced by BSMM. Identity-based and socioeconomic stigma were heavily interlinked due to longstanding structural racism and homophobia. Assumptions of sexual risk were particularly complex.ConclusionWe discovered a significant negative relationship between anticipated healthcare stigma and PrEP use, further elucidated in our qualitative findings. This builds upon our previous work exploring intracommunity PrEP stigma among BSMM. Healthcare stigma serves as an additional obstacle to accessing PrEP for BSMM. This highlights its importance as a target for provider-level health equity policy and research interventions. Future research exploring this stigma in specific healthcare settings is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251330710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251330710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a critical tool for HIV-prevention, yet PrEP uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is relatively low, despite greater HIV vulnerability. Stigma in healthcare settings can be a substantial barrier to PrEP use among BSMM, with implications for the HIV epidemic. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to assess quantitative relationships between anticipated healthcare stigma and reduced PrEP use among BSMM, and qualitatively explore stigmatizing experiences within healthcare settings among this population.MethodsWe utilized 2 data sources. First, cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (n = 151) was collected in late 2020 in the United States. We tested for associations between healthcare stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (n = 23) from this sample in the D.C. metropolitan area for qualitative interviews starting in 2022; we used thematic analysis to investigate forms of experienced and anticipated healthcare stigma related to PrEP use.ResultsWe found 82% lower PrEP use associated with an interquartile range increase in anticipated healthcare stigma after adjustment (aPR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.59). Subsequently, our qualitative investigation revealed that identity-specific stigma, negative socioeconomic assumptions, and assumptions of sexual risk were prevalent themes in the healthcare stigmatization experienced by BSMM. Identity-based and socioeconomic stigma were heavily interlinked due to longstanding structural racism and homophobia. Assumptions of sexual risk were particularly complex.ConclusionWe discovered a significant negative relationship between anticipated healthcare stigma and PrEP use, further elucidated in our qualitative findings. This builds upon our previous work exploring intracommunity PrEP stigma among BSMM. Healthcare stigma serves as an additional obstacle to accessing PrEP for BSMM. This highlights its importance as a target for provider-level health equity policy and research interventions. Future research exploring this stigma in specific healthcare settings is recommended.

"医疗保健不在乎":关于黑人性少数群体男性的医疗羞辱和 PrEP 使用情况的混合方法研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信