"Healthcare Doesn't Care": A Mixed-Methods Study on Healthcare Stigma and PrEP Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rodman Turpin, Aaron D Camp, C J Mandell, Rochelle Davidson Mhonde, Julia Mandeville, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo
{"title":"\"Healthcare Doesn't Care\": A Mixed-Methods Study on Healthcare Stigma and PrEP Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men.","authors":"Rodman Turpin, Aaron D Camp, C J Mandell, Rochelle Davidson Mhonde, Julia Mandeville, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo","doi":"10.1177/08901171251330710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a critical tool for HIV-prevention, yet PrEP uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is relatively low, despite greater HIV vulnerability. Stigma in healthcare settings can be a substantial barrier to PrEP use among BSMM, with implications for the HIV epidemic. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to assess quantitative relationships between anticipated healthcare stigma and reduced PrEP use among BSMM, and qualitatively explore stigmatizing experiences within healthcare settings among this population.MethodsWe utilized 2 data sources. First, cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (n = 151) was collected in late 2020 in the United States. We tested for associations between healthcare stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (n = 23) from this sample in the D.C. metropolitan area for qualitative interviews starting in 2022; we used thematic analysis to investigate forms of experienced and anticipated healthcare stigma related to PrEP use.ResultsWe found 82% lower PrEP use associated with an interquartile range increase in anticipated healthcare stigma after adjustment (aPR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.59). Subsequently, our qualitative investigation revealed that identity-specific stigma, negative socioeconomic assumptions, and assumptions of sexual risk were prevalent themes in the healthcare stigmatization experienced by BSMM. Identity-based and socioeconomic stigma were heavily interlinked due to longstanding structural racism and homophobia. Assumptions of sexual risk were particularly complex.ConclusionWe discovered a significant negative relationship between anticipated healthcare stigma and PrEP use, further elucidated in our qualitative findings. This builds upon our previous work exploring intracommunity PrEP stigma among BSMM. Healthcare stigma serves as an additional obstacle to accessing PrEP for BSMM. This highlights its importance as a target for provider-level health equity policy and research interventions. Future research exploring this stigma in specific healthcare settings is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251330710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251330710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a critical tool for HIV-prevention, yet PrEP uptake among Black sexual minority men (BSMM) is relatively low, despite greater HIV vulnerability. Stigma in healthcare settings can be a substantial barrier to PrEP use among BSMM, with implications for the HIV epidemic. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to assess quantitative relationships between anticipated healthcare stigma and reduced PrEP use among BSMM, and qualitatively explore stigmatizing experiences within healthcare settings among this population.MethodsWe utilized 2 data sources. First, cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (n = 151) was collected in late 2020 in the United States. We tested for associations between healthcare stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (n = 23) from this sample in the D.C. metropolitan area for qualitative interviews starting in 2022; we used thematic analysis to investigate forms of experienced and anticipated healthcare stigma related to PrEP use.ResultsWe found 82% lower PrEP use associated with an interquartile range increase in anticipated healthcare stigma after adjustment (aPR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.59). Subsequently, our qualitative investigation revealed that identity-specific stigma, negative socioeconomic assumptions, and assumptions of sexual risk were prevalent themes in the healthcare stigmatization experienced by BSMM. Identity-based and socioeconomic stigma were heavily interlinked due to longstanding structural racism and homophobia. Assumptions of sexual risk were particularly complex.ConclusionWe discovered a significant negative relationship between anticipated healthcare stigma and PrEP use, further elucidated in our qualitative findings. This builds upon our previous work exploring intracommunity PrEP stigma among BSMM. Healthcare stigma serves as an additional obstacle to accessing PrEP for BSMM. This highlights its importance as a target for provider-level health equity policy and research interventions. Future research exploring this stigma in specific healthcare settings is recommended.

"医疗保健不在乎":关于黑人性少数群体男性的医疗羞辱和 PrEP 使用情况的混合方法研究。
暴露前预防(PrEP)是预防艾滋病毒的重要工具,但黑人性少数男性(BSMM)的PrEP使用率相对较低,尽管更容易感染艾滋病毒。卫生保健环境中的污名化可能成为BSMM使用PrEP的重大障碍,对艾滋病毒流行产生影响。我们使用顺序解释性混合方法来评估BSMM中预期的医疗污名化与PrEP使用减少之间的定量关系,并定性地探索该人群在医疗环境中的污名化经历。方法采用2个数据来源。首先,于2020年底在美国收集了BSMM试点样本(n = 151)的横断面数据。我们使用修正泊松回归测试了医疗耻辱与PrEP使用之间的关系。随后,我们从该样本中选择了华盛顿大都会地区的参与者(n = 23),从2022年开始进行定性访谈;我们使用主题分析来调查与PrEP使用相关的经验和预期的医疗耻辱形式。结果:我们发现PrEP使用率降低82%与调整后预期医疗耻感的四分位数范围增加相关(aPR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.59)。随后,我们的定性调查显示,身份特异性污名、负面的社会经济假设和性风险假设是BSMM经历的医疗保健污名的普遍主题。由于长期存在的结构性种族主义和同性恋恐惧症,基于身份的耻辱和社会经济耻辱紧密相连。对性风险的假设尤其复杂。结论:我们发现预期的医疗耻辱与PrEP使用之间存在显著的负相关关系,这在我们的定性研究中得到了进一步的阐明。这是建立在我们以前的工作探索社区内PrEP耻辱在BSMM。医疗污名是获得预防BSMM的另一个障碍。这突出了它作为提供者一级卫生公平政策和研究干预措施目标的重要性。建议未来的研究在特定的医疗环境中探索这种耻辱感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信