Unpacking the European Commission: Cabinet Composition and EU Policy-Making

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
William T. Daniel, Steffen Hurka
{"title":"Unpacking the European Commission: Cabinet Composition and EU Policy-Making","authors":"William T. Daniel,&nbsp;Steffen Hurka","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine bureaucratic politics within the European Commission, using novel data on the backgrounds of individual members of Commissioners' <i>cabinets</i>. Although <i>cabinet</i> composition has become increasingly regulated in recent decades, its selection remains a key area for personalised political appointments within an organisation more commonly known for its collective responsibility and lack of individual influence. Using data on the personal and professional backgrounds of <i>cabinet</i> members since the first Barroso Commission, we trace how administrative reforms meant primarily to ‘de-nationalise’ the selection of appointees have led to changes in <i>cabinet</i> composition. We then explore how <i>cabinet</i> composition impacts on the complexity of Commission proposals and its subsequent inter-institutional negotiations. We find that whilst more diversity of Commission cabinets clearly enhances the input legitimacy of the EU's legislative process, it neither benefits nor threatens the quality of the Commission's policy proposals or how they are processed politically.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 3","pages":"987-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13678","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine bureaucratic politics within the European Commission, using novel data on the backgrounds of individual members of Commissioners' cabinets. Although cabinet composition has become increasingly regulated in recent decades, its selection remains a key area for personalised political appointments within an organisation more commonly known for its collective responsibility and lack of individual influence. Using data on the personal and professional backgrounds of cabinet members since the first Barroso Commission, we trace how administrative reforms meant primarily to ‘de-nationalise’ the selection of appointees have led to changes in cabinet composition. We then explore how cabinet composition impacts on the complexity of Commission proposals and its subsequent inter-institutional negotiations. We find that whilst more diversity of Commission cabinets clearly enhances the input legitimacy of the EU's legislative process, it neither benefits nor threatens the quality of the Commission's policy proposals or how they are processed politically.

Abstract Image

解读欧盟委员会:内阁组成和欧盟政策制定
我们研究了欧盟委员会内部的官僚政治,使用了关于委员内阁个别成员背景的新数据。尽管近几十年来,内阁组成越来越受到监管,但在一个以集体责任和缺乏个人影响力而闻名的组织内,内阁人选仍然是个人化政治任命的关键领域。利用自第一届巴罗佐委员会(Barroso Commission)以来内阁成员的个人和专业背景数据,我们追踪了行政改革是如何导致内阁组成发生变化的。行政改革的主要目的是将任命人选“去国有化”。然后,我们探讨内阁组成如何影响委员会提案的复杂性及其随后的机构间谈判。我们发现,虽然委员会内阁的更多多样性明显提高了欧盟立法程序的投入合法性,但它既不会有利于也不会威胁委员会政策建议的质量,也不会影响它们在政治上的处理方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信