Aoife Conway, Deirdre Harkin, Assumpta Ryan, Paul Slater
{"title":"Examination and testing of structural validity of the Confidence in Dementia Scale with nursing students. An international perspective","authors":"Aoife Conway, Deirdre Harkin, Assumpta Ryan, Paul Slater","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As the prevalence of dementia continues to rise globally, nurses are increasingly at the forefront of providing care. Effective dementia care relies on not just knowledge, but also the confidence to translate this knowledge into meaningful action. Enhancing nursing education programmes to build both knowledge and confidence is critical. As no studies have explored measuring confidence in dementia care over an extended period (beyond six months), there is a need for a rigorous and robust analysis of the Confidence in Dementia (CODE) Scale, to determine whether it is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing confidence over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional series design was used to collect longitudinal data from a census of nursing students over a 3-year period. A standardized instrument, the Confidence in Dementia Scale was administered repeatedly to a sample (time 1 <em>n</em> = 247; time 2 <em>n</em> = 239; time 3 = <em>n</em> = 216). Analyses were performed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and JASP for structural equation modelling. An initial exploratory factor analysis was conducted using the first data set to explore the factor structure. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed (on the second and third data sets) to confirm the factor structure and assess the model's overall validity. COSMIN guidelines inform the analysis process, and the findings are reported using STROBE guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The factor structure replicated and confirmed the one factor structure identified by international findings. The findings confirm its usefulness of the Confidence in Dementia scale to gauge health professionals' confidence in dementia care before going into practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the need for psychometrically valid tools that can measure confidence over an extended period, encompassing the three-year degree programme and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 106723"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
As the prevalence of dementia continues to rise globally, nurses are increasingly at the forefront of providing care. Effective dementia care relies on not just knowledge, but also the confidence to translate this knowledge into meaningful action. Enhancing nursing education programmes to build both knowledge and confidence is critical. As no studies have explored measuring confidence in dementia care over an extended period (beyond six months), there is a need for a rigorous and robust analysis of the Confidence in Dementia (CODE) Scale, to determine whether it is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing confidence over time.
Methods
A cross-sectional series design was used to collect longitudinal data from a census of nursing students over a 3-year period. A standardized instrument, the Confidence in Dementia Scale was administered repeatedly to a sample (time 1 n = 247; time 2 n = 239; time 3 = n = 216). Analyses were performed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and JASP for structural equation modelling. An initial exploratory factor analysis was conducted using the first data set to explore the factor structure. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed (on the second and third data sets) to confirm the factor structure and assess the model's overall validity. COSMIN guidelines inform the analysis process, and the findings are reported using STROBE guidelines.
Results
The factor structure replicated and confirmed the one factor structure identified by international findings. The findings confirm its usefulness of the Confidence in Dementia scale to gauge health professionals' confidence in dementia care before going into practice.
Conclusions
This study highlights the need for psychometrically valid tools that can measure confidence over an extended period, encompassing the three-year degree programme and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.