The feasibility and acceptability of outdoor sessions as an add-on of an online multicomponent program (FIBROWALK) for fibromyalgia: A pilot randomized controlled trial

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mayte Serrat , Jaime Navarrete , Carla Rodríguez-Freire , Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer , Miriam Almirall , Rubén Nieto , Jesús Montero-Marín , Juan V. Luciano , Albert Feliu-Soler
{"title":"The feasibility and acceptability of outdoor sessions as an add-on of an online multicomponent program (FIBROWALK) for fibromyalgia: A pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"Mayte Serrat ,&nbsp;Jaime Navarrete ,&nbsp;Carla Rodríguez-Freire ,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer ,&nbsp;Miriam Almirall ,&nbsp;Rubén Nieto ,&nbsp;Jesús Montero-Marín ,&nbsp;Juan V. Luciano ,&nbsp;Albert Feliu-Soler","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2025.501817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>The given text describes a pilot randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of outdoor sessions as an add-on to an online multicomponent program (FIBROWALK) for fibromyalgia (FM) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The trial involved 110 participants with FM (99% women; mean age of 51.89<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.89 years) from a tertiary hospital in Spain who were randomly assigned to either the online FIBROWALK program (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->38) or the blended FIBROWALK program arm (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->61; online FIBROWALK plus 4 outdoor sessions).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, attrition was minimal (14.01%) and adherence to the outdoor session was modest (52% of the group attended at least one outdoor session). Participants’ expectations and opinions were positive. Paired-samples <em>t</em>-tests for examining within-group differences showed that participants in each arm had significantly improved functional impairment, anxious-depressive symptomatology, physical function, and fear of pain symptoms. Analysis of covariance for examining between-group differences showed that the blended FIBROWALK had a significantly higher effect on psychological distress than the online FIBROWALK (<em>F</em>(1,96)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4.23; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.042; Cohen's <em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.60).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that the blended program was feasible, secure, and acceptable to the participants. Although the online FIBROWALK program alone may be sufficient for managing fibromyalgia symptoms, the addition of outdoor sessions may provide significant additional benefits. Future definitive randomized controlled trials are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 501817"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X25000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

The given text describes a pilot randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of outdoor sessions as an add-on to an online multicomponent program (FIBROWALK) for fibromyalgia (FM) patients.

Materials and methods

The trial involved 110 participants with FM (99% women; mean age of 51.89 ± 1.89 years) from a tertiary hospital in Spain who were randomly assigned to either the online FIBROWALK program (n = 38) or the blended FIBROWALK program arm (n = 61; online FIBROWALK plus 4 outdoor sessions).

Results

Overall, attrition was minimal (14.01%) and adherence to the outdoor session was modest (52% of the group attended at least one outdoor session). Participants’ expectations and opinions were positive. Paired-samples t-tests for examining within-group differences showed that participants in each arm had significantly improved functional impairment, anxious-depressive symptomatology, physical function, and fear of pain symptoms. Analysis of covariance for examining between-group differences showed that the blended FIBROWALK had a significantly higher effect on psychological distress than the online FIBROWALK (F(1,96) = 4.23; p = .042; Cohen's d = .60).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the blended program was feasible, secure, and acceptable to the participants. Although the online FIBROWALK program alone may be sufficient for managing fibromyalgia symptoms, the addition of outdoor sessions may provide significant additional benefits. Future definitive randomized controlled trials are warranted.
简介和目标本文介绍了一项试点随机对照试验,旨在评估户外课程作为纤维肌痛(FM)患者在线多组件课程(FIBROWALK)的附加课程的可行性和可接受性。西班牙一家三甲医院的 110 名 FM 患者(99% 为女性;平均年龄为 51.89 ± 1.89 岁)被随机分配到在线 FIBROWALK 计划(n = 38)或混合 FIBROWALK 计划组(n = 61;在线 FIBROWALK 加 4 次户外训练)。参与者的期望和意见都是积极的。用于检验组内差异的配对样本 t 检验显示,每组参与者的功能障碍、焦虑抑郁症状、身体功能和疼痛恐惧症状均有显著改善。用于检验组间差异的协方差分析表明,混合 FIBROWALK 对心理困扰的影响明显高于在线 FIBROWALK(F(1,96) = 4.23; p = .042; Cohen's d = .60)。尽管仅靠在线 FIBROWALK 程序就足以控制纤维肌痛症状,但增加户外课程可能会带来显著的额外益处。未来有必要进行明确的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信