General purpose technology R&D specialization and supply chain cross-industry expansion: The moderation effect of technology portfolio breadth and depth

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Feng Dong , Guiyang Zhang , Liang Mei
{"title":"General purpose technology R&D specialization and supply chain cross-industry expansion: The moderation effect of technology portfolio breadth and depth","authors":"Feng Dong ,&nbsp;Guiyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Liang Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the general purpose technology (GPT) was first introduced, scholars have shown great interest in its giant impact and have extensively discussed its diffusion and commercialization within whole industry supply chain. However, few studies explore how GPT R&amp;D of a firm incentives its collaboration with new cross-industry partners and thus expands its own supply chain. Drawing on innovational complementarities of GPTs and the technology spillover theory, this study focuses on the concept of “specialization” as the main source of complementarities, and investigates the nonlinear relationship between a firm's specialization in GPT R&amp;D and its cross-industry supply chain expansion. Based on a sample of 297 “firm-year” observations from 45 top firms during the period 2010–2019, the empirical results suggest that a firm's GPT R&amp;D specialization has an inverted U-shape impact on its supply chain cross-industry expansion. Furthermore, its technology portfolio breadth moderates the inverted U-shaped relationship in the way that the higher the breadth, the flatter the inverted U-shaped curve. However, the effect of technology portfolio depth is opposite, yet statistically insignificant. The findings provide new insights into how GPT R&amp;D reconfigures supply chain collaboration from the perspective of innovation complementarities. They also guide the firm to configure a moderate level of GPT R&amp;D specialization and a lower level of technology portfolio breadth to achieve better performance in supply chain cross-industry expansion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500079X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the general purpose technology (GPT) was first introduced, scholars have shown great interest in its giant impact and have extensively discussed its diffusion and commercialization within whole industry supply chain. However, few studies explore how GPT R&D of a firm incentives its collaboration with new cross-industry partners and thus expands its own supply chain. Drawing on innovational complementarities of GPTs and the technology spillover theory, this study focuses on the concept of “specialization” as the main source of complementarities, and investigates the nonlinear relationship between a firm's specialization in GPT R&D and its cross-industry supply chain expansion. Based on a sample of 297 “firm-year” observations from 45 top firms during the period 2010–2019, the empirical results suggest that a firm's GPT R&D specialization has an inverted U-shape impact on its supply chain cross-industry expansion. Furthermore, its technology portfolio breadth moderates the inverted U-shaped relationship in the way that the higher the breadth, the flatter the inverted U-shaped curve. However, the effect of technology portfolio depth is opposite, yet statistically insignificant. The findings provide new insights into how GPT R&D reconfigures supply chain collaboration from the perspective of innovation complementarities. They also guide the firm to configure a moderate level of GPT R&D specialization and a lower level of technology portfolio breadth to achieve better performance in supply chain cross-industry expansion.
通用技术研发专业化与供应链跨行业扩张:技术组合广度和深度的调节作用
自通用技术(GPT)问世以来,学者们对其巨大的影响表现出极大的兴趣,并对其在整个行业供应链中的扩散和商业化进行了广泛的讨论。然而,很少有研究探讨企业的GPT研发如何激励其与新的跨行业合作伙伴的合作,从而扩大自己的供应链。本文借鉴GPT的创新互补性和技术溢出理论,将“专业化”概念作为互补性的主要来源,探讨了企业GPT研发专业化与其跨行业供应链扩张之间的非线性关系。基于2010-2019年45家顶级企业的297个“企业年”观察样本,实证结果表明,企业GPT研发专业化对其供应链跨行业扩张具有倒u型影响。此外,其技术组合宽度调节倒u型关系,其宽度越高,倒u型曲线越平坦。而技术组合深度的影响是相反的,但统计上不显著。研究结果为GPT研发如何从创新互补的角度重新配置供应链协作提供了新的见解。它们还指导企业配置中等水平的GPT研发专业化和较低水平的技术组合宽度,以实现供应链跨行业扩张的更好绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信