Disparities in troponin and ECG testing among emergency department patients with chest pain

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michael Gottlieb MD , Eric Moyer MD , Vinodinee Dissanayake MD, MPH , Yanina Purim-Shem-Tov MD, MS , Garth Walker MD, MPH , Theodore Corbin MD, MPP , Kyle Bernard MD , Kevin Buell MBBS, MS
{"title":"Disparities in troponin and ECG testing among emergency department patients with chest pain","authors":"Michael Gottlieb MD ,&nbsp;Eric Moyer MD ,&nbsp;Vinodinee Dissanayake MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Yanina Purim-Shem-Tov MD, MS ,&nbsp;Garth Walker MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Theodore Corbin MD, MPP ,&nbsp;Kyle Bernard MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Buell MBBS, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior studies have highlighted disparities in the evaluation of chest pain based on patient race and sex. However, these studies were limited by small sample sizes and may not represent national practice patterns. This study evaluated differences in electrocardiogram (ECG) and troponin testing among emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms, focusing on variations by sex, race, ethnicity, and primary spoken language.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms from 01/01/2016–12/31/2023 was conducted by searching the Epic Cosmos research platform separately for ECG and troponin testing. ECG and troponin testing rates were stratified and analyzed by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and primary language. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 205,526,173 adult ED visits, 37,138,334 (18.1 %) met the inclusion criteria for chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. For patients with full demographic data available, 30,648,879 of 36,672,008 (83.6 %) and 26,615,155 of 36,672,075 (72.6 %) underwent ECG and troponin testing, respectively. ECG testing was more frequent in male patients (OR:1.059; 95 %CI:1.058–1.060), Asian patients (OR:1.006; 95 %CI:1.004–1.009), and patients primarily speaking Spanish (OR:1.039; 95 %CI:1.040–1.042) or other non-English languages (OR:1.054; 95 %CI:1.051–1.056). However, it was less frequent among Black or African American patients (OR:0.955; 95 %CI:0.954–0.956) and individuals identifying as other races (OR:0.961; 95 %CI:0.959–0.963). Troponin testing was also more common in male patients (OR:1.087; 95 %CI:1.086–1.087) and those primarily speaking Spanish (OR:1.016; 95 %CI:1.014–1.019) or other non-English languages (OR:1.064; 95 %CI:1.061–1.067), but less common among Hispanic or Latino patients (OR:0.923; 95 %CI:0.921–0.924) and non-white patients (OR range:0.918–0.950).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disparities in ECG and troponin testing were identified among ED patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. Testing rates were lower in female and non-white patients, while patients primarily speaking non-English languages had higher testing rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725002293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have highlighted disparities in the evaluation of chest pain based on patient race and sex. However, these studies were limited by small sample sizes and may not represent national practice patterns. This study evaluated differences in electrocardiogram (ECG) and troponin testing among emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms, focusing on variations by sex, race, ethnicity, and primary spoken language.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms from 01/01/2016–12/31/2023 was conducted by searching the Epic Cosmos research platform separately for ECG and troponin testing. ECG and troponin testing rates were stratified and analyzed by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and primary language. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Among 205,526,173 adult ED visits, 37,138,334 (18.1 %) met the inclusion criteria for chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. For patients with full demographic data available, 30,648,879 of 36,672,008 (83.6 %) and 26,615,155 of 36,672,075 (72.6 %) underwent ECG and troponin testing, respectively. ECG testing was more frequent in male patients (OR:1.059; 95 %CI:1.058–1.060), Asian patients (OR:1.006; 95 %CI:1.004–1.009), and patients primarily speaking Spanish (OR:1.039; 95 %CI:1.040–1.042) or other non-English languages (OR:1.054; 95 %CI:1.051–1.056). However, it was less frequent among Black or African American patients (OR:0.955; 95 %CI:0.954–0.956) and individuals identifying as other races (OR:0.961; 95 %CI:0.959–0.963). Troponin testing was also more common in male patients (OR:1.087; 95 %CI:1.086–1.087) and those primarily speaking Spanish (OR:1.016; 95 %CI:1.014–1.019) or other non-English languages (OR:1.064; 95 %CI:1.061–1.067), but less common among Hispanic or Latino patients (OR:0.923; 95 %CI:0.921–0.924) and non-white patients (OR range:0.918–0.950).

Conclusions

Disparities in ECG and troponin testing were identified among ED patients presenting with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. Testing rates were lower in female and non-white patients, while patients primarily speaking non-English languages had higher testing rates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信