Application of multi-criteria decision analysis for optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations in Oklahoma

Q1 Engineering
Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2025.100325
Khondhaker Al Momin, Arif Mohaimin Sadri, Kanthasamy K. Muraleetharan, Richard Campos, P. Scott Harvey
{"title":"Application of multi-criteria decision analysis for optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations in Oklahoma","authors":"Khondhaker Al Momin,&nbsp;Arif Mohaimin Sadri,&nbsp;Kanthasamy K. Muraleetharan,&nbsp;Richard Campos,&nbsp;P. Scott Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2025.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) necessitates a well-planned and resilient charging infrastructure to support widespread accessibility. This study presents a systematic, data-driven framework for optimal electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) site selection by integrating multi-criteria decision analysis (AHP &amp; Fuzzy-AHP), spatial optimization using Voronoi diagrams, and sensitivity analysis. Key decision factors include accessibility, vehicle ownership density, proximity to points of interest and resilience to environmental hazards such as floods and wildfires. AHP and Fuzzy-AHP suitability maps are compared to identify areas of agreement and uncertainty, leading to an integrated suitability map that enhances decision-making confidence. A Voronoi-based spatial optimization approach is then employed to iteratively refine EVCS placement, ensuring fair coverage and minimizing redundancy. Results indicate that urban EVCS should be spaced every 6-10 km apart to accommodate high trip frequency, while rural areas require stations every 15-20 km, with additional placements at highway junctions to prevent accessibility gaps. The study also highlights the importance of a location specific charging mix, recommending Level 2 chargers for residential and workplace settings and DC Fast Chargers for highways and high-traffic areas. Beyond spatial optimization, this study emphasizes the importance of an adaptive, phased deployment strategy, where EVCS expansion is guided by real-world demand rather than static planning assumptions. The proposed framework is scalable and transferable, providing a replicable methodology for EVCS planning across diverse geographic regions. By bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical deployment, this study contributes to the development of a resilient and demand-responsive EV charging network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X25000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) necessitates a well-planned and resilient charging infrastructure to support widespread accessibility. This study presents a systematic, data-driven framework for optimal electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) site selection by integrating multi-criteria decision analysis (AHP & Fuzzy-AHP), spatial optimization using Voronoi diagrams, and sensitivity analysis. Key decision factors include accessibility, vehicle ownership density, proximity to points of interest and resilience to environmental hazards such as floods and wildfires. AHP and Fuzzy-AHP suitability maps are compared to identify areas of agreement and uncertainty, leading to an integrated suitability map that enhances decision-making confidence. A Voronoi-based spatial optimization approach is then employed to iteratively refine EVCS placement, ensuring fair coverage and minimizing redundancy. Results indicate that urban EVCS should be spaced every 6-10 km apart to accommodate high trip frequency, while rural areas require stations every 15-20 km, with additional placements at highway junctions to prevent accessibility gaps. The study also highlights the importance of a location specific charging mix, recommending Level 2 chargers for residential and workplace settings and DC Fast Chargers for highways and high-traffic areas. Beyond spatial optimization, this study emphasizes the importance of an adaptive, phased deployment strategy, where EVCS expansion is guided by real-world demand rather than static planning assumptions. The proposed framework is scalable and transferable, providing a replicable methodology for EVCS planning across diverse geographic regions. By bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical deployment, this study contributes to the development of a resilient and demand-responsive EV charging network.
多准则决策分析在俄克拉荷马州电动汽车充电站最优选址中的应用
电动汽车(ev)的快速普及需要一个规划良好、具有弹性的充电基础设施,以支持广泛的可及性。本研究结合多准则决策分析(AHP &;模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy-AHP),利用Voronoi图进行空间优化,以及灵敏度分析。关键的决策因素包括可达性、车辆拥有量密度、与兴趣点的接近程度以及对洪水和野火等环境危害的抵御能力。比较了AHP和Fuzzy-AHP适宜性图,确定了一致和不确定的区域,形成了一个综合的适宜性图,增强了决策的信心。然后采用基于voronoi的空间优化方法迭代优化EVCS的放置,确保公平覆盖并最大限度地减少冗余。结果表明,城市EVCS应每隔6-10公里设置一个站点,以适应高出行频率,而农村EVCS应每隔15-20公里设置一个站点,并在高速公路路口额外设置站点,以防止可达性缺口。该研究还强调了特定地点充电组合的重要性,建议在住宅和工作场所使用2级充电器,在高速公路和交通繁忙地区使用直流快速充电器。除了空间优化之外,本研究还强调了自适应、分阶段部署策略的重要性,即EVCS的扩展以现实需求为指导,而不是静态规划假设。拟议的框架具有可扩展性和可转移性,为跨不同地理区域的EVCS规划提供了可复制的方法。通过弥合理论模型和实际部署之间的差距,本研究有助于建立一个有弹性和需求响应的电动汽车充电网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书