Explainable AI for tool condition monitoring using Explainable Boosting Machine

Lorenzo Colantonio , Lucas Equeter , Pierre Dehombreux , François Ducobu
{"title":"Explainable AI for tool condition monitoring using Explainable Boosting Machine","authors":"Lorenzo Colantonio ,&nbsp;Lucas Equeter ,&nbsp;Pierre Dehombreux ,&nbsp;François Ducobu","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machining is one of the most critical sectors in the manufacturing industry, but the quality of the parts produced is highly dependent on the condition of the cutting tools. Poor management of tool replacement can lead to increased production costs and reduced product quality. Various methods exist to monitor tool wear and optimize their replacement. However, most of these methods rely on ”black-box” AI models, which significantly limit their practical use. In this article, a “glass-box” method called Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) is used to monitor the degradation of cutting tools for the turning operation. This method aims to be as accurate as ”black-box” models while being fully interpretable. A comparison between the EBM method and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach is presented to evaluate the performance differences between these two models. The results indicate that although the EBM model’s performance is slightly lower than the ANN’s, it remains adequate for monitoring tool wear, with an average R<sup>2</sup> score only 2% lower. The global and local explainability of the model is also presented. The global analysis demonstrates that the model uses coherent features for estimating tool wear, proving that it has successfully understood the wear phenomena being monitored. The local explainability highlights the contribution of each input to the tool wear estimation. These two explainability analyses show results that are consistent with the physical phenomenon of wear, for example, the model identifies that an increase in cutting force implies an increase in tool wear. This provides explainability for its use, improving trust in the monitoring method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"133 ","pages":"Pages 138-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125001131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machining is one of the most critical sectors in the manufacturing industry, but the quality of the parts produced is highly dependent on the condition of the cutting tools. Poor management of tool replacement can lead to increased production costs and reduced product quality. Various methods exist to monitor tool wear and optimize their replacement. However, most of these methods rely on ”black-box” AI models, which significantly limit their practical use. In this article, a “glass-box” method called Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) is used to monitor the degradation of cutting tools for the turning operation. This method aims to be as accurate as ”black-box” models while being fully interpretable. A comparison between the EBM method and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach is presented to evaluate the performance differences between these two models. The results indicate that although the EBM model’s performance is slightly lower than the ANN’s, it remains adequate for monitoring tool wear, with an average R2 score only 2% lower. The global and local explainability of the model is also presented. The global analysis demonstrates that the model uses coherent features for estimating tool wear, proving that it has successfully understood the wear phenomena being monitored. The local explainability highlights the contribution of each input to the tool wear estimation. These two explainability analyses show results that are consistent with the physical phenomenon of wear, for example, the model identifies that an increase in cutting force implies an increase in tool wear. This provides explainability for its use, improving trust in the monitoring method.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信