Life cycle assessment of cutting tool coatings

Ishrat Fairoz , Alborz Shokrani
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of cutting tool coatings","authors":"Ishrat Fairoz ,&nbsp;Alborz Shokrani","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The majority of cutting tools used in industry are coated to improve their performance. Despite this, the environmental impacts of cutting tools and their coatings have been widely overlooked. This paper quantifies the embodied energy and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of cutting tools, with an emphasis on the coating process, by conducting a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) and Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) coating methods have been evaluated, focusing on TiAlN, AlTiN, TiN, AlCrN, and uncoated tool cases. The embodied energy and GWP per unit area for the Cathodic Arc Evaporation PVD case varied between 7.75 – 67.16 Wh/mm<sup>2</sup> and 1.56 – 13.55 kgCO₂-eq/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively, depending on the coating batch size. The Magnetron Sputter Deposition PVD case recorded the lowest embodied energy of 3.87 Wh/mm<sup>2</sup> and GWP of 0.78 kgCO₂-eq/mm<sup>2</sup>. The CVD deposition showed the highest embodied energy of 11.04 Wh/mm<sup>2</sup> and GWP of 2.56 kgCO₂-eq/mm<sup>2</sup> for a similar batch size. The analysis indicates that when coating emissions are compared to the carbide tool emissions, the increase in tool life due to coating outweighs the increase in emissions by coating the tool in most cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"133 ","pages":"Pages 55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of cutting tools used in industry are coated to improve their performance. Despite this, the environmental impacts of cutting tools and their coatings have been widely overlooked. This paper quantifies the embodied energy and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of cutting tools, with an emphasis on the coating process, by conducting a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) and Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) coating methods have been evaluated, focusing on TiAlN, AlTiN, TiN, AlCrN, and uncoated tool cases. The embodied energy and GWP per unit area for the Cathodic Arc Evaporation PVD case varied between 7.75 – 67.16 Wh/mm2 and 1.56 – 13.55 kgCO₂-eq/mm2, respectively, depending on the coating batch size. The Magnetron Sputter Deposition PVD case recorded the lowest embodied energy of 3.87 Wh/mm2 and GWP of 0.78 kgCO₂-eq/mm2. The CVD deposition showed the highest embodied energy of 11.04 Wh/mm2 and GWP of 2.56 kgCO₂-eq/mm2 for a similar batch size. The analysis indicates that when coating emissions are compared to the carbide tool emissions, the increase in tool life due to coating outweighs the increase in emissions by coating the tool in most cases.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信