Performance and efficiency of co-simulation for milling operations in robotic machining

Hugo Dantinne , Valentin Dambly , Olivier Verlinden , François Ducobu , Edouard Riviere-Lorphevre , Bryan Olivier
{"title":"Performance and efficiency of co-simulation for milling operations in robotic machining","authors":"Hugo Dantinne ,&nbsp;Valentin Dambly ,&nbsp;Olivier Verlinden ,&nbsp;François Ducobu ,&nbsp;Edouard Riviere-Lorphevre ,&nbsp;Bryan Olivier","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In robotic machining, tool/workpiece interaction generates forces that impact the performance of the robotic arm. This leads to defections due to its lower stiffness compared to dedicated machining machines, particularly at its joints. These deflections can degrade the quality of the machining operation, making trajectory and orientation optimization essential. Accurate optimization requires knowledge of the transient force field for the operation and a model of the robot. Currently, the simulations are performed using two in-house simulation frameworks : EasyDyn for the multibody dynamics of robot modelling and Dystamill for the modelling of the cutting forces. To enhance the simulation’s modularity, co-simulation between the multibody system (MBS) of the robot and the workpiece (with calculation of cutting forces for the latter) is proposed, allowing for better integration of the coupled dynamics. The decision on where to partition the model is critical. Given that the workpiece transmits force elements while the robot transmits position data, a displacement-force coupling approach is proposed. Co-simulation offers several advantages, including the ability to use dedicated software tailored to different parts of the model and facilitating the interfacing of various robots with different machining models. However, the modularity offered by co-simulation techniques is counterbalanced by less accurate results with respect to those obtained with monolithic models. This research aims to evaluate the influence of the accuracy of the results on a simple model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"133 ","pages":"Pages 114-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125001234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In robotic machining, tool/workpiece interaction generates forces that impact the performance of the robotic arm. This leads to defections due to its lower stiffness compared to dedicated machining machines, particularly at its joints. These deflections can degrade the quality of the machining operation, making trajectory and orientation optimization essential. Accurate optimization requires knowledge of the transient force field for the operation and a model of the robot. Currently, the simulations are performed using two in-house simulation frameworks : EasyDyn for the multibody dynamics of robot modelling and Dystamill for the modelling of the cutting forces. To enhance the simulation’s modularity, co-simulation between the multibody system (MBS) of the robot and the workpiece (with calculation of cutting forces for the latter) is proposed, allowing for better integration of the coupled dynamics. The decision on where to partition the model is critical. Given that the workpiece transmits force elements while the robot transmits position data, a displacement-force coupling approach is proposed. Co-simulation offers several advantages, including the ability to use dedicated software tailored to different parts of the model and facilitating the interfacing of various robots with different machining models. However, the modularity offered by co-simulation techniques is counterbalanced by less accurate results with respect to those obtained with monolithic models. This research aims to evaluate the influence of the accuracy of the results on a simple model.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信