Moral injury and mental health in healthcare workers are linked to organizational culture and modifiable workplace conditions: Results of a national, mixed-methods study conducted at Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Natalie Purcell, Daniel Bertenthal, Hajra Usman, Brandon J Griffin, Shira Maguen, Sarah McGrath, Joanne Spetz, Sylvia J Hysong, Haley Mehlman, Karen H Seal
{"title":"Moral injury and mental health in healthcare workers are linked to organizational culture and modifiable workplace conditions: Results of a national, mixed-methods study conducted at Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Natalie Purcell, Daniel Bertenthal, Hajra Usman, Brandon J Griffin, Shira Maguen, Sarah McGrath, Joanne Spetz, Sylvia J Hysong, Haley Mehlman, Karen H Seal","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmen.0000085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using mixed methods, we examined drivers of risk for moral injury, mental health symptoms, and burnout among frontline healthcare workers in high-risk Veterans Affairs (VA) clinical settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Across 21 VA medical centers, 2,004 healthcare workers completed an online survey assessing potential risk factors for moral injury, posttraumatic stress, depression, and burnout. Assessed risk factors included: pandemic exposures; individual worker characteristics; aspects of workplace/organizational culture; and facility performance on standardized measures of care quality, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction (extracted from VA administrative data). Among surveyed workers, 39% were at risk for moral injury, 41% for posttraumatic stress, 27% for depression, and 25% for persistent burnout. In generalized linear mixed models, significant predictors of moral injury risk included perceived lack of management support for worker health/safety, supervisor support, coworker support, and empowerment to make job-related decisions-all modifiable workplace factors. Pandemic-related risk factors for moral injury included prolonged short-staffing, denying patient-family visits, and high work-family conflict. Predictors of posttraumatic stress, depression, and burnout were similar. Forty-six surveyed workers completed a follow-up qualitative interview about experiences of moral distress in the workplace, and interview themes aligned closely with survey findings. Rapid qualitative analysis identified protective factors that may reduce moral injury risk, including a collaborative workplace community, engaged leadership, empowerment to make changes in the workplace, and opportunity to process distressing events. We conclude with recommendations to mitigate moral injury risk in healthcare organizations. These include involving workers in discussions of high-stakes decisions that will affect them, creating consistent and clear channels of communication between the frontlines and leaders of the organization, practicing leadership rounding to improve leaders' understanding of the daily work of frontline teams, and collaborating to understand how existing processes and policies may contribute to safety risks and moral conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":520078,"journal":{"name":"PLOS mental health","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using mixed methods, we examined drivers of risk for moral injury, mental health symptoms, and burnout among frontline healthcare workers in high-risk Veterans Affairs (VA) clinical settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Across 21 VA medical centers, 2,004 healthcare workers completed an online survey assessing potential risk factors for moral injury, posttraumatic stress, depression, and burnout. Assessed risk factors included: pandemic exposures; individual worker characteristics; aspects of workplace/organizational culture; and facility performance on standardized measures of care quality, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction (extracted from VA administrative data). Among surveyed workers, 39% were at risk for moral injury, 41% for posttraumatic stress, 27% for depression, and 25% for persistent burnout. In generalized linear mixed models, significant predictors of moral injury risk included perceived lack of management support for worker health/safety, supervisor support, coworker support, and empowerment to make job-related decisions-all modifiable workplace factors. Pandemic-related risk factors for moral injury included prolonged short-staffing, denying patient-family visits, and high work-family conflict. Predictors of posttraumatic stress, depression, and burnout were similar. Forty-six surveyed workers completed a follow-up qualitative interview about experiences of moral distress in the workplace, and interview themes aligned closely with survey findings. Rapid qualitative analysis identified protective factors that may reduce moral injury risk, including a collaborative workplace community, engaged leadership, empowerment to make changes in the workplace, and opportunity to process distressing events. We conclude with recommendations to mitigate moral injury risk in healthcare organizations. These include involving workers in discussions of high-stakes decisions that will affect them, creating consistent and clear channels of communication between the frontlines and leaders of the organization, practicing leadership rounding to improve leaders' understanding of the daily work of frontline teams, and collaborating to understand how existing processes and policies may contribute to safety risks and moral conflict.

医疗工作者的道德伤害和心理健康与组织文化和可改变的工作环境有关:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心进行的一项全国性混合方法研究的结果。
采用混合方法,我们研究了COVID-19大流行期间高风险退伍军人事务部(VA)临床环境中一线医护人员的道德伤害、精神健康症状和倦怠风险的驱动因素。在21个VA医疗中心,2004名医护人员完成了一项在线调查,评估道德伤害、创伤后压力、抑郁和倦怠的潜在风险因素。评估的风险因素包括:大流行暴露;个体劳动者特征;工作场所/组织文化方面;以及医院在护理质量、患者满意度和员工满意度(从VA管理数据中提取)的标准化衡量标准上的表现。在接受调查的员工中,39%的人有道德伤害的风险,41%的人有创伤后压力,27%的人有抑郁症,25%的人有持续的职业倦怠。在广义线性混合模型中,道德伤害风险的重要预测因素包括缺乏对工人健康/安全的管理支持,主管支持,同事支持,以及做出与工作相关的决策的授权-所有可修改的工作场所因素。与大流行相关的道德伤害风险因素包括长期的人员短缺、拒绝患者家属探视以及工作与家庭之间的高度冲突。创伤后应激、抑郁和倦怠的预测因子相似。46名接受调查的员工完成了一项关于工作场所道德困扰经历的后续定性访谈,访谈主题与调查结果密切相关。快速定性分析确定了可能降低道德伤害风险的保护性因素,包括协作的工作场所社区,参与的领导,在工作场所进行变革的授权,以及处理痛苦事件的机会。最后,我们提出了降低医疗机构道德伤害风险的建议。这些措施包括让员工参与对他们有影响的高风险决策的讨论,在一线和组织领导人之间建立一致和清晰的沟通渠道,实行领导轮岗,以提高领导人对一线团队日常工作的理解,以及合作了解现有流程和政策如何可能导致安全风险和道德冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信