Association of feeding practices with growth in infants: a longitudinal observational study in a rural district of Pakistan.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001204
Waliyah Mughis, Sheraz Ahmed, Fayaz Umrani, Sadaf Jakhro, Khaliq Qureshi, Amnat Mangrio, Arjumand Rizvi, Asad Ali
{"title":"Association of feeding practices with growth in infants: a longitudinal observational study in a rural district of Pakistan.","authors":"Waliyah Mughis, Sheraz Ahmed, Fayaz Umrani, Sadaf Jakhro, Khaliq Qureshi, Amnat Mangrio, Arjumand Rizvi, Asad Ali","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is recommended for the first 6 months of an infant's life, but barriers to EBF persist due to sociocultural, economic and health-related factors in resource-poor settings. This study examines the association between feeding practices and malnutrition in a birth cohort from a rural district of Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a cohort of n=2697 infants, up to 6 months of age, through routine household visits by community health workers. The study analysed demographic characteristics, feeding practices, anthropometric and health information of infants and their mothers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breastfeeding practices varied, with EBF being more common in the first month, while predominant breastfeeding (breastmilk with non-milk liquids) was most prevalent from 1 to 6 months. Almost all (98.3%) infants had been breastfed at some point between birth and 6 months but <10% were being exclusively breastfed by 6 months of age, with a significant proportion already identified as wasting (14.7%), stunted (36.7%) and underweight (38.5%) at baseline (birth). Early initiation of complementary feeding or breastmilk alternatives before 4 months was significantly associated with increased odds of wasting by 6 months of age (adjusted OR (AOR)=4.14; 95% CI: 1.95 to 8.77; p<0.001). Infants not born in medical facilities had higher risks of wasting (AOR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.13 to 5.21) and underweight status (AOR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that infants were over four times more likely to be malnourished by 6 months if complementary feeding was initiated before 4 months of age. While causal relations/directionality cannot be established from these findings, we believe that parents may resort to suboptimal complementary feeding practices shortly after birth, due to perceived inadequate infant growth. A tailored approach addressing systemic barriers to optimal feeding practices is recommended for resource-constrained, nutrition-poor settings, such as rural Pakistan.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is recommended for the first 6 months of an infant's life, but barriers to EBF persist due to sociocultural, economic and health-related factors in resource-poor settings. This study examines the association between feeding practices and malnutrition in a birth cohort from a rural district of Pakistan.

Methods: Data were collected from a cohort of n=2697 infants, up to 6 months of age, through routine household visits by community health workers. The study analysed demographic characteristics, feeding practices, anthropometric and health information of infants and their mothers.

Results: Breastfeeding practices varied, with EBF being more common in the first month, while predominant breastfeeding (breastmilk with non-milk liquids) was most prevalent from 1 to 6 months. Almost all (98.3%) infants had been breastfed at some point between birth and 6 months but <10% were being exclusively breastfed by 6 months of age, with a significant proportion already identified as wasting (14.7%), stunted (36.7%) and underweight (38.5%) at baseline (birth). Early initiation of complementary feeding or breastmilk alternatives before 4 months was significantly associated with increased odds of wasting by 6 months of age (adjusted OR (AOR)=4.14; 95% CI: 1.95 to 8.77; p<0.001). Infants not born in medical facilities had higher risks of wasting (AOR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.13 to 5.21) and underweight status (AOR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.71).

Conclusion: Our study indicates that infants were over four times more likely to be malnourished by 6 months if complementary feeding was initiated before 4 months of age. While causal relations/directionality cannot be established from these findings, we believe that parents may resort to suboptimal complementary feeding practices shortly after birth, due to perceived inadequate infant growth. A tailored approach addressing systemic barriers to optimal feeding practices is recommended for resource-constrained, nutrition-poor settings, such as rural Pakistan.

喂养方法与婴儿生长的关系:巴基斯坦农村地区的一项纵向观察研究。
背景:纯母乳喂养(EBF)被推荐用于婴儿生命的前6个月,但在资源贫乏的环境中,由于社会文化、经济和健康相关因素,EBF的障碍仍然存在。本研究调查了巴基斯坦农村地区出生队列中喂养方式与营养不良之间的关系。方法:通过社区卫生工作者的常规家访,从n=2697名6个月以下的婴儿中收集数据。该研究分析了婴儿及其母亲的人口特征、喂养方法、人体测量学和健康信息。结果:母乳喂养的做法各不相同,EBF在第一个月更常见,而主要母乳喂养(母乳加非乳汁)在1至6个月最普遍。几乎所有(98.3%)婴儿在出生到6个月之间的某个时间点都接受过母乳喂养,但结论:我们的研究表明,如果在4个月之前开始补充喂养,婴儿在6个月时营养不良的可能性要高出4倍以上。虽然因果关系/方向性不能从这些发现中建立,但我们认为父母可能在出生后不久就采取了次优的补充喂养方法,因为他们认为婴儿生长发育不足。建议针对资源受限、营养不良的环境,如巴基斯坦农村,采取量身定制的方法,解决影响最佳喂养做法的系统性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信