{"title":"[Impact of Differences in Radiopharmaceuticals on Brain Perfusion SPECT Phantom Examination Using the Hoffman 3D Brain Phantom].","authors":"Norikazu Matsutomo, Koya Hayakawa, Eiji Hisano, Takaaki Konno, Mitsuha Fukami, Tomoaki Yamamoto","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the effects of radiopharmaceuticals and buffer solutions on the accuracy of the Hoffman phantom examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hoffman phantom was prepared using the water immersion method and was injected with 3 different solutions: <sup>123</sup>I-MIBG, <sup>123</sup>I-IMP only, and <sup>123</sup>I-IMP plus buffer solution. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed at 3-time points: immediately after encapsulation, after 10 min of stirring, and after 20 min of stirring. The relative SPECT counts and left-right ratios of the images obtained under each condition were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the buffer solution facilitated the mixing of <sup>123</sup>I-IMP, affecting the initial distribution of the radiopharmaceutical. However, after 20 min of stirring, no significant differences were observed in the relative SPECT counts and the left-right ratio of SPECT images among the different solutions, regardless of the radiopharmaceutical type or the presence of the buffer, in most regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Buffer solution promotes the mixing process; however, it was confirmed that sufficient agitation alone can produce comparable SPECT images, indicating that the use of a buffer may not be necessary if proper agitation is ensured during phantom preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the effects of radiopharmaceuticals and buffer solutions on the accuracy of the Hoffman phantom examination.
Methods: The Hoffman phantom was prepared using the water immersion method and was injected with 3 different solutions: 123I-MIBG, 123I-IMP only, and 123I-IMP plus buffer solution. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed at 3-time points: immediately after encapsulation, after 10 min of stirring, and after 20 min of stirring. The relative SPECT counts and left-right ratios of the images obtained under each condition were evaluated.
Results: The results revealed that the buffer solution facilitated the mixing of 123I-IMP, affecting the initial distribution of the radiopharmaceutical. However, after 20 min of stirring, no significant differences were observed in the relative SPECT counts and the left-right ratio of SPECT images among the different solutions, regardless of the radiopharmaceutical type or the presence of the buffer, in most regions.
Conclusion: Buffer solution promotes the mixing process; however, it was confirmed that sufficient agitation alone can produce comparable SPECT images, indicating that the use of a buffer may not be necessary if proper agitation is ensured during phantom preparation.