A comparative analysis of vitrification and two slow freezing methods for gonocyte-containing neonatal calf testicular tissue and subsequent in vitro culture.

In vitro models Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s44164-025-00085-8
Shiyan Tang, Celine Jones, Jill Davies, Sheila Lane, Kevin Coward
{"title":"A comparative analysis of vitrification and two slow freezing methods for gonocyte-containing neonatal calf testicular tissue and subsequent in vitro culture.","authors":"Shiyan Tang, Celine Jones, Jill Davies, Sheila Lane, Kevin Coward","doi":"10.1007/s44164-025-00085-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cryopreservation of neonatal testicular tissue containing gonocytes is crucial for preserving genetic diversity, advancing research, and developing reproductive technologies. In this study, we investigated three cryopreservation techniques, slow freezing (in which the rate of freezing was controlled or uncontrolled) and vitrification, using neonatal bovine testicular tissues containing gonocytes, followed by in vitro culture to evaluate cell functionality. Vitrification resulted in a significantly lower proportion (19.15 ± 1.82%) of seminiferous tubules with > 70% attachment to the basement membrane in comparison to both the controlled slow freezing group (47.89 ± 10.98%) and the uncontrolled slow freezing group (39.05 ± 4.15%) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of seminiferous tubules containing PGP9.5-positive germ cells when compared between the three methods. Comparable densities of germ cells per unit area were observed in the controlled/uncontrolled slow freezing groups and the vitrification group (7.89 ± 1.83, 7.75 ± 1.75, and 7.92 ± 1.23/104 µm<sup>2</sup>, respectively). In addition, the proportions of Sertoli cells (vimentin-positive) and proliferating cells (Ki67-positive) were similar across the three cryopreservation methods. There were no significant differences in cell membrane integrity and the expression of selected genes when compared between the three cryopreservation groups. Compared to fresh tissue, the uncontrolled slow freezing groups exhibited significantly higher levels of apoptosis (<i>P</i> < 0.05); there was no significant change in the controlled slow freezing and vitrification group. Notably, all in vitro cultures of testicular cells, from both fresh and freeze/thawed tissues, displayed the formation of germ cell colonies. Our data demonstrate that vitrification effectively preserves neonatal bovine testicular tissues containing gonocytes, safeguarding cell membrane integrity, promoting proliferation, and protecting against apoptosis. Collectively, these findings propose vitrification as a promising alternative cryopreservation method for immature testicular tissue (ITT) in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73357,"journal":{"name":"In vitro models","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vitro models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44164-025-00085-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cryopreservation of neonatal testicular tissue containing gonocytes is crucial for preserving genetic diversity, advancing research, and developing reproductive technologies. In this study, we investigated three cryopreservation techniques, slow freezing (in which the rate of freezing was controlled or uncontrolled) and vitrification, using neonatal bovine testicular tissues containing gonocytes, followed by in vitro culture to evaluate cell functionality. Vitrification resulted in a significantly lower proportion (19.15 ± 1.82%) of seminiferous tubules with > 70% attachment to the basement membrane in comparison to both the controlled slow freezing group (47.89 ± 10.98%) and the uncontrolled slow freezing group (39.05 ± 4.15%) (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of seminiferous tubules containing PGP9.5-positive germ cells when compared between the three methods. Comparable densities of germ cells per unit area were observed in the controlled/uncontrolled slow freezing groups and the vitrification group (7.89 ± 1.83, 7.75 ± 1.75, and 7.92 ± 1.23/104 µm2, respectively). In addition, the proportions of Sertoli cells (vimentin-positive) and proliferating cells (Ki67-positive) were similar across the three cryopreservation methods. There were no significant differences in cell membrane integrity and the expression of selected genes when compared between the three cryopreservation groups. Compared to fresh tissue, the uncontrolled slow freezing groups exhibited significantly higher levels of apoptosis (P < 0.05); there was no significant change in the controlled slow freezing and vitrification group. Notably, all in vitro cultures of testicular cells, from both fresh and freeze/thawed tissues, displayed the formation of germ cell colonies. Our data demonstrate that vitrification effectively preserves neonatal bovine testicular tissues containing gonocytes, safeguarding cell membrane integrity, promoting proliferation, and protecting against apoptosis. Collectively, these findings propose vitrification as a promising alternative cryopreservation method for immature testicular tissue (ITT) in clinical applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信