Implementation strategies used in policy, systems, and environmental interventions addressing obesity-related outcomes in early childhood education settings: a systematic review.

Cody D Neshteruk, Courtney T Luecking, Chelsea L Kracht, Sarah Burkart, Emily M Melnick, Robert E Anderson, Hannah G Lane
{"title":"Implementation strategies used in policy, systems, and environmental interventions addressing obesity-related outcomes in early childhood education settings: a systematic review.","authors":"Cody D Neshteruk, Courtney T Luecking, Chelsea L Kracht, Sarah Burkart, Emily M Melnick, Robert E Anderson, Hannah G Lane","doi":"10.1186/s43058-025-00718-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches, including those enacted in early childhood education (ECE) settings, can improve child health outcomes. The use of implementation strategies, or the ways in which these approaches are enacted across settings, may modify intervention impact. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine the implementation strategies used among interventions utilizing PSE approaches in the ECE setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, were searched for interventions in ECE settings including children (0-6 years) that utilized ≥ 1 PSE approach. Eligible studies included either a child-level outcome (i.e., weight, physical activity, or diet) or an environmental outcome (i.e., nutrition and physical activity environment). Data extracted included study characteristics, description of the intervention, and description of the implementation of the intervention. Implementation strategies were coded using the School Implementation Strategies Translating ERIC Resources (SISTER) taxonomy. The Downs and Black checklist was completed to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and four studies representing 97 interventions were identified. Fourteen (14%) did not report any implementation strategies. Of the remaining 83 interventions reporting implementation strategies, the mean number of implementation strategies employed per intervention was 3.8 (± 2.3) (range 1-11). However, few interventions (5/83, 6%) clearly named and defined implementation strategies. Most implementation strategies came from the \"train and educate stakeholders\" SISTER domain (177/318, 56%), and the most frequently used implementation strategy was \"conduct educational meetings (50/83, 60%). Most studies were classified as good (59/104, 57%) or fair (40/104, 38%) quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this review, many interventions appeared to use multiple implementation strategies to support ECE PSE interventions, though few explicitly documented or described those strategies. These findings suggest that more precise documentation of implementation strategies is needed to enhance replication and scalability of ECE interventions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO# CRD42022306670.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00718-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches, including those enacted in early childhood education (ECE) settings, can improve child health outcomes. The use of implementation strategies, or the ways in which these approaches are enacted across settings, may modify intervention impact. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine the implementation strategies used among interventions utilizing PSE approaches in the ECE setting.

Methods: Seven databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, were searched for interventions in ECE settings including children (0-6 years) that utilized ≥ 1 PSE approach. Eligible studies included either a child-level outcome (i.e., weight, physical activity, or diet) or an environmental outcome (i.e., nutrition and physical activity environment). Data extracted included study characteristics, description of the intervention, and description of the implementation of the intervention. Implementation strategies were coded using the School Implementation Strategies Translating ERIC Resources (SISTER) taxonomy. The Downs and Black checklist was completed to assess study quality.

Results: One hundred and four studies representing 97 interventions were identified. Fourteen (14%) did not report any implementation strategies. Of the remaining 83 interventions reporting implementation strategies, the mean number of implementation strategies employed per intervention was 3.8 (± 2.3) (range 1-11). However, few interventions (5/83, 6%) clearly named and defined implementation strategies. Most implementation strategies came from the "train and educate stakeholders" SISTER domain (177/318, 56%), and the most frequently used implementation strategy was "conduct educational meetings (50/83, 60%). Most studies were classified as good (59/104, 57%) or fair (40/104, 38%) quality.

Conclusions: In this review, many interventions appeared to use multiple implementation strategies to support ECE PSE interventions, though few explicitly documented or described those strategies. These findings suggest that more precise documentation of implementation strategies is needed to enhance replication and scalability of ECE interventions.

Registration: PROSPERO# CRD42022306670.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信