Factors influencing normalisation and sustainment of the Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS): a qualitative implementation evaluation study with UK maternity health professionals.

Nimarta Dharni, Agnieszka Latuszynska, Sophie-Anna Dann, Nina Johns, Graeme Currie, Sara Kenyon
{"title":"Factors influencing normalisation and sustainment of the Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS): a qualitative implementation evaluation study with UK maternity health professionals.","authors":"Nimarta Dharni, Agnieszka Latuszynska, Sophie-Anna Dann, Nina Johns, Graeme Currie, Sara Kenyon","doi":"10.1186/s43058-025-00710-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternity triage is the emergency portal to access maternity services for pregnant or newly postnatal women experiencing unexpected complications or concerns. Traditionally women were seen in the order in which they attended maternity services without appropriate organisational and clinical systems in place to prioritise the clinical urgency of the women presenting. The Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) is a standardised triage system co-developed by clinicians and researchers to address this need. Since its inception in 2013, BSOTS is now the recommended triage system and has been widely implemented in the UK with international adoption also occurring. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the normalisation and sustainment of BSOTS in UK maternity units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative evaluation study involving semi-structured interviews with 43 maternity professionals across 9 sites representing a range of implementation experiences (normalised n=3, partially normalised n=3, and probably not normalised n= 3). Participants were maternity triage staff of varying levels including midwives, obstetricians and senior leaders. Interviews were held virtually, and recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on Normalisation Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contextual factors were key to influencing implementation and sustainment of BSOTS. In sites where BSOTS was normalised and integrated into routine practice, organisational and leadership buy-in helped mobilise support for other contextual factors required for implementation fidelity and success, including establishing a clear identity of the triage department, sufficient midwifery and obstetric staffing, appropriate space, a dedicated and protected core team, adequate equipment and resources. Accommodating these factors often meant complex system-level changes were required to implement BSOTS for which strategic intentions and organisational support were integral. In some cases, such support was facilitated by Care Quality Commission regulatory recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found successful implementation and normalisation of BSOTS was driven by contextual factors, particularly organisational buy-in and leadership support. While regulatory requirements enabled the prioritisation of triage within maternity services, our evaluation emphasised the importance of both leadership and frontline staff support for effective integration and sustainment. Evaluation findings were used to inform an implementation toolkit for clinical triage teams seeking to implement or reinvigorate BSOTS in their sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00710-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternity triage is the emergency portal to access maternity services for pregnant or newly postnatal women experiencing unexpected complications or concerns. Traditionally women were seen in the order in which they attended maternity services without appropriate organisational and clinical systems in place to prioritise the clinical urgency of the women presenting. The Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) is a standardised triage system co-developed by clinicians and researchers to address this need. Since its inception in 2013, BSOTS is now the recommended triage system and has been widely implemented in the UK with international adoption also occurring. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the normalisation and sustainment of BSOTS in UK maternity units.

Methods: A qualitative evaluation study involving semi-structured interviews with 43 maternity professionals across 9 sites representing a range of implementation experiences (normalised n=3, partially normalised n=3, and probably not normalised n= 3). Participants were maternity triage staff of varying levels including midwives, obstetricians and senior leaders. Interviews were held virtually, and recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on Normalisation Process Theory.

Results: Contextual factors were key to influencing implementation and sustainment of BSOTS. In sites where BSOTS was normalised and integrated into routine practice, organisational and leadership buy-in helped mobilise support for other contextual factors required for implementation fidelity and success, including establishing a clear identity of the triage department, sufficient midwifery and obstetric staffing, appropriate space, a dedicated and protected core team, adequate equipment and resources. Accommodating these factors often meant complex system-level changes were required to implement BSOTS for which strategic intentions and organisational support were integral. In some cases, such support was facilitated by Care Quality Commission regulatory recommendations.

Conclusions: Our study found successful implementation and normalisation of BSOTS was driven by contextual factors, particularly organisational buy-in and leadership support. While regulatory requirements enabled the prioritisation of triage within maternity services, our evaluation emphasised the importance of both leadership and frontline staff support for effective integration and sustainment. Evaluation findings were used to inform an implementation toolkit for clinical triage teams seeking to implement or reinvigorate BSOTS in their sites.

影响伯明翰症状特异性产科分诊系统(BSOTS)正常化和维持的因素:与英国产科保健专业人员进行的定性实施评估研究。
背景:产妇分诊是孕妇或新生儿遇到意外并发症或担忧时获得产妇服务的紧急门户。传统上,妇女是按照她们参加产科服务的顺序来看待的,没有适当的组织和临床系统来优先考虑妇女的临床紧迫性。伯明翰症状特异性产科分诊系统(BSOTS)是一个标准化的分诊系统,由临床医生和研究人员共同开发,以解决这一需求。自2013年成立以来,BSOTS现在是推荐的分诊系统,并已在英国广泛实施,国际上也正在采用。本研究旨在探讨影响英国妇产单位BSOTS正常化和维持的因素。方法:一项定性评估研究,包括对9个地点的43名产科专业人员进行半结构化访谈,代表了一系列的实施经验(n =3归一化,n=3部分归一化,n=3可能不归一化)。参与者是不同级别的产妇分诊工作人员,包括助产士、产科医生和高级领导。面谈以虚拟方式进行,并逐字记录和抄写。分析基于归一化过程理论。结果:环境因素是影响BSOTS实施和维持的关键因素。在BSOTS标准化并纳入日常实践的地点,组织和领导的支持有助于动员对实施保真和成功所需的其他背景因素的支持,包括建立明确的分类部门,足够的助产和产科人员,适当的空间,专门和受保护的核心团队,充足的设备和资源。适应这些因素通常意味着需要进行复杂的系统级更改,以实施战略意图和组织支持不可或缺的BSOTS。在某些情况下,护理质量委员会的监管建议促进了这种支持。结论:我们的研究发现,BSOTS的成功实施和正常化是由情境因素驱动的,特别是组织的支持和领导的支持。虽然监管要求能够在产科服务中优先考虑分诊,但我们的评估强调了领导层和一线工作人员对有效整合和维持的支持的重要性。评估结果被用于告知临床分诊团队的实施工具包,以寻求在其站点实施或重振BSOTS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信