Translation, adaptation, and validation of Person-Centered Primary Care Measures for patients in family doctor contract services within mainland China.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yang Wang, Dehua Yu, Hua Jin
{"title":"Translation, adaptation, and validation of Person-Centered Primary Care Measures for patients in family doctor contract services within mainland China.","authors":"Yang Wang, Dehua Yu, Hua Jin","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02796-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of China's health reforms aimed at strengthening primary care through the Family Doctor Contract Service Program, effectively measuring its functional features is paramount. This study seeks to translate, adapt, and validate the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) for primary care patients enrolled in family doctor contract services in mainland China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the guidelines by Sousa and Rojjanasrirat, we translated and adapted the PCPCM into Simplified Chinese and evaluated its psychometric properties. A total of 583 patients enrolled in family doctor contract services from 10 primary care facilities in Shanghai, China, participated in the study. We assessed the structural validity, internal consistency, stability reliability, and criterion validity of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version in accordance with the practical guidelines developed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) initiative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study led to the development of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version tailored for patients receiving family doctor contract services (PCPCM-SC-FDCS), specifically designed to address the needs of populations most closely aligned with the concept of \"primary care patients\" in mainland China. Initial pilot testing prompted refinements to enhance clarity and applicability, particularly for Item 5 (Relationship). Analyses of the refined PCPCM-SC-FDCS, based on a three-point Likert scale, revealed that structural validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity all met the criteria for good measurement properties outlined in the relevant guidelines. However, for test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the first and second surveys was 0.58, which fell short of the recommended threshold of ≥ 0.70.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCPCM-SC-FDCS demonstrates satisfactory reliability and strong feasibility as a tool for evaluating the functional features of primary care among Family Doctor Contract Service Program patients in mainland China. Although further testing and refinement are necessary, this instrument offers a feasible and straightforward approach to evaluating service quality, supporting family doctor teams in enhancing primary care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02796-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of China's health reforms aimed at strengthening primary care through the Family Doctor Contract Service Program, effectively measuring its functional features is paramount. This study seeks to translate, adapt, and validate the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) for primary care patients enrolled in family doctor contract services in mainland China.

Methods: Following the guidelines by Sousa and Rojjanasrirat, we translated and adapted the PCPCM into Simplified Chinese and evaluated its psychometric properties. A total of 583 patients enrolled in family doctor contract services from 10 primary care facilities in Shanghai, China, participated in the study. We assessed the structural validity, internal consistency, stability reliability, and criterion validity of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version in accordance with the practical guidelines developed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) initiative.

Results: The study led to the development of the PCPCM-Simplified Chinese version tailored for patients receiving family doctor contract services (PCPCM-SC-FDCS), specifically designed to address the needs of populations most closely aligned with the concept of "primary care patients" in mainland China. Initial pilot testing prompted refinements to enhance clarity and applicability, particularly for Item 5 (Relationship). Analyses of the refined PCPCM-SC-FDCS, based on a three-point Likert scale, revealed that structural validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity all met the criteria for good measurement properties outlined in the relevant guidelines. However, for test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the first and second surveys was 0.58, which fell short of the recommended threshold of ≥ 0.70.

Conclusions: The PCPCM-SC-FDCS demonstrates satisfactory reliability and strong feasibility as a tool for evaluating the functional features of primary care among Family Doctor Contract Service Program patients in mainland China. Although further testing and refinement are necessary, this instrument offers a feasible and straightforward approach to evaluating service quality, supporting family doctor teams in enhancing primary care delivery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信