Canadian Recommendations on Optimal Breast Biopsy Practices Developed Using a Modified Delphi Panel.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zina S Kellow, Afsaneh Alikhassi, Anita Bane, Mary Beth Bissell, Erin Cordeiro, Kavita Dhamanaskar, Jenny Jessup, Ryan Conor Kirwan, Gary Ko, Zuzana Kos, Ameya Kulkarni, Christophe Cloutier Lambert, Tetyana Martin, Elaine McKevitt, Silma Solorzano, Saly Zahra, Caitlin Ward
{"title":"Canadian Recommendations on Optimal Breast Biopsy Practices Developed Using a Modified Delphi Panel.","authors":"Zina S Kellow, Afsaneh Alikhassi, Anita Bane, Mary Beth Bissell, Erin Cordeiro, Kavita Dhamanaskar, Jenny Jessup, Ryan Conor Kirwan, Gary Ko, Zuzana Kos, Ameya Kulkarni, Christophe Cloutier Lambert, Tetyana Martin, Elaine McKevitt, Silma Solorzano, Saly Zahra, Caitlin Ward","doi":"10.1177/08465371251325500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few recommendations in Canada to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate biopsy techniques (fine-needle aspiration, core-needle biopsy, vacuum-assisted biopsy, vacuum-assisted excision) and imaging technologies (mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced mammography) for biopsy guidance. Limited existing recommendations from other countries do not consider the unique aspects of the Canadian healthcare system. To address this gap, 17 experts participated in a modified Delphi panel to reach consensus on biopsy-related topics and provide recommendations. The panel was comprised of 12 radiologists, 2 pathologists, and 3 surgeons from 6 provinces across Canada. Panelists engaged in two rounds of anonymized voting, with an in-person discussion held between the rounds. The modified Delphi panel adhered to best practices, including establishing consensus definitions prior to voting, utilizing anonymized voting, and abstaining from communication among panelists before the in-person meeting. A rigorous statistical approach was utilized to analyze the points of agreement and disagreement. Consensus findings covered a wide range of topics, including recommendations for initial biopsy technique based on lesion type and imaging modality, patient management or rebiopsy considerations after the initial biopsy, procedural recommendations (i.e., gauge size, number of samples), patient considerations (i.e., drug allergies, pregnancy). Overall, 347 individual items were included in the final analysis, 286 (82%) of which achieved consensus. These consensus recommendations intend to offer general recommendations to help standardize and improve practices across Canada and were endorsed by the Canadian Society of Breast Imaging. However, they should be evaluated in the context of each individual case and emerging evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55290,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"8465371251325500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251325500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few recommendations in Canada to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate biopsy techniques (fine-needle aspiration, core-needle biopsy, vacuum-assisted biopsy, vacuum-assisted excision) and imaging technologies (mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced mammography) for biopsy guidance. Limited existing recommendations from other countries do not consider the unique aspects of the Canadian healthcare system. To address this gap, 17 experts participated in a modified Delphi panel to reach consensus on biopsy-related topics and provide recommendations. The panel was comprised of 12 radiologists, 2 pathologists, and 3 surgeons from 6 provinces across Canada. Panelists engaged in two rounds of anonymized voting, with an in-person discussion held between the rounds. The modified Delphi panel adhered to best practices, including establishing consensus definitions prior to voting, utilizing anonymized voting, and abstaining from communication among panelists before the in-person meeting. A rigorous statistical approach was utilized to analyze the points of agreement and disagreement. Consensus findings covered a wide range of topics, including recommendations for initial biopsy technique based on lesion type and imaging modality, patient management or rebiopsy considerations after the initial biopsy, procedural recommendations (i.e., gauge size, number of samples), patient considerations (i.e., drug allergies, pregnancy). Overall, 347 individual items were included in the final analysis, 286 (82%) of which achieved consensus. These consensus recommendations intend to offer general recommendations to help standardize and improve practices across Canada and were endorsed by the Canadian Society of Breast Imaging. However, they should be evaluated in the context of each individual case and emerging evidence.

加拿大很少有建议来帮助临床医生选择适当的活检技术(细针穿刺术、核心针活检术、真空辅助活检术、真空辅助切除术)和成像技术(乳腺 X 线照相术、超声波、磁共振成像、造影剂增强乳腺 X 线照相术)作为活检指导。其他国家现有的有限建议并未考虑加拿大医疗保健系统的独特性。为了弥补这一不足,17 位专家参加了一个改良德尔菲小组,就活检相关主题达成共识并提出建议。专家组由来自加拿大 6 个省的 12 名放射科医生、2 名病理科医生和 3 名外科医生组成。小组成员进行了两轮匿名投票,并在两轮投票之间进行了当面讨论。修改后的德尔菲小组遵守了最佳实践,包括在投票前建立共识定义、使用匿名投票以及在面对面会议前小组成员之间不进行交流。我们采用了严格的统计方法来分析共识和分歧点。共识结果涵盖了广泛的主题,包括基于病变类型和成像方式的初始活检技术建议、初始活检后的患者管理或再活检注意事项、程序建议(即标尺大小、样本数量)、患者注意事项(即药物过敏、怀孕)。总体而言,共有 347 个单项被纳入最终分析,其中 286 个单项(82%)达成了共识。这些共识建议旨在提供一般性建议,以帮助加拿大各地规范和改进实践,并得到了加拿大乳腺成像学会的认可。不过,应根据每个病例和新出现的证据对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal is a peer-reviewed, Medline-indexed publication that presents a broad scientific review of radiology in Canada. The Journal covers such topics as abdominal imaging, cardiovascular radiology, computed tomography, continuing professional development, education and training, gastrointestinal radiology, health policy and practice, magnetic resonance imaging, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, pediatric radiology, radiology history, radiology practice guidelines and advisories, thoracic and cardiac imaging, trauma and emergency room imaging, ultrasonography, and vascular and interventional radiology. Article types considered for publication include original research articles, critically appraised topics, review articles, guest editorials, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信