Christine Lu-Emerson, Sajeel Chowdhary, Rupesh Kotecha, Akanksha Sharma, Yazmin Odia, Brian Vaillant, Charles Redfern, Aaron Mammoser, Kent Shih, Santosh Kesari, Richard Peterson, Bret Friday, W Jeffery Edenfield, Sebastian Koga, James Snyder, Jerry Jaboin, Isaac Melguizo-Gavilanes, Melissa McCabe, Michael Humeniuk, Prakash Ambady, Erin Dunbar
{"title":"A pilot survey into the landscape of neuro-oncology care in the community.","authors":"Christine Lu-Emerson, Sajeel Chowdhary, Rupesh Kotecha, Akanksha Sharma, Yazmin Odia, Brian Vaillant, Charles Redfern, Aaron Mammoser, Kent Shih, Santosh Kesari, Richard Peterson, Bret Friday, W Jeffery Edenfield, Sebastian Koga, James Snyder, Jerry Jaboin, Isaac Melguizo-Gavilanes, Melissa McCabe, Michael Humeniuk, Prakash Ambady, Erin Dunbar","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexities of the field of neuro-oncology require multidisciplinary collaboration in order to deliver contemporary comprehensive care. There is increasing awareness that much of neuro-oncology care occurs in the community setting. In 2022, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) created the Community Neuro-Oncology Committee (CNO) in an inaugural attempt to formally acknowledge community neuro-oncology practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 19 question survey was developed by SNO-CNO to gather initial data on the current landscape of neuro-oncology care in the community. The survey was distributed via the SNO newsletter and email blasts as well as through partnerships with multiple advocacy groups. Results were analyzed and tabulated through R2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 112 responses from providers in the United States and Canada. Most providers were physicians and represented multiple disciplines including neurology, neuro-oncology, medical oncology, neurosurgery, and radiation oncology. Sixty-four (57%) described themselves as neuro-oncology-focused. Eighty-eight (79%) reported access to neuro-oncology tumor boards. Sixty-eight (73%) stated they had access to molecular tumor boards. Most respondents felt that they were adequately supported to manage neuro-oncology patients. When dividing responses based on a neuro-oncology-focused practice compared to a less neuro-oncology-focused practice, there were significant differences between access to molecular tumors boards (85% vs 63%, P = .023) and access to clinical trials (98% vs 82%, P = .022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This qualitative and quantitative hypothesis-generating data is the start of understanding the challenges faced by community neuro-oncology providers. These results will guide future studies and recommendations aimed toward better supporting them and their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The complexities of the field of neuro-oncology require multidisciplinary collaboration in order to deliver contemporary comprehensive care. There is increasing awareness that much of neuro-oncology care occurs in the community setting. In 2022, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) created the Community Neuro-Oncology Committee (CNO) in an inaugural attempt to formally acknowledge community neuro-oncology practitioners.
Methods: A 19 question survey was developed by SNO-CNO to gather initial data on the current landscape of neuro-oncology care in the community. The survey was distributed via the SNO newsletter and email blasts as well as through partnerships with multiple advocacy groups. Results were analyzed and tabulated through R2.
Results: There were 112 responses from providers in the United States and Canada. Most providers were physicians and represented multiple disciplines including neurology, neuro-oncology, medical oncology, neurosurgery, and radiation oncology. Sixty-four (57%) described themselves as neuro-oncology-focused. Eighty-eight (79%) reported access to neuro-oncology tumor boards. Sixty-eight (73%) stated they had access to molecular tumor boards. Most respondents felt that they were adequately supported to manage neuro-oncology patients. When dividing responses based on a neuro-oncology-focused practice compared to a less neuro-oncology-focused practice, there were significant differences between access to molecular tumors boards (85% vs 63%, P = .023) and access to clinical trials (98% vs 82%, P = .022).
Conclusion: This qualitative and quantitative hypothesis-generating data is the start of understanding the challenges faced by community neuro-oncology providers. These results will guide future studies and recommendations aimed toward better supporting them and their patients.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.