Deep learning for identifying cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1485
Felix Corr, Dustin Grimm, Paul Leach
{"title":"Deep learning for identifying cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Felix Corr, Dustin Grimm, Paul Leach","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a significant contributor for unintentional durotomy following anterior spinal surgery, neural compression, and cervical myelopathy. While traditional diagnostic methods like plain radiography are commonly used, they may yield false negatives. The diagnostic accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence methods for detecting this condition remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the performance of deep learning models (DLMs) in diagnosing and predicting cervical OPLL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review assesses the utilization of DLMs in diagnosing and predicting OPLL. Inclusion criteria were defined as the use of DLM for the diagnosis and prediction of cervical OPLL in adult patients. Databases included PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and BASE. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a pooled sample size of 3,373 patients were included. The pooled accuracy, area under the curve, sensitivity, and accuracy are 0.93, 0.92, 0.88, and 0.9. DLM demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, outperforming human comparator groups in terms of sensitivity (0.86 <i>vs.</i> 0.77), specificity (0.98 <i>vs.</i> 0.74), and accuracy (0.89 <i>vs.</i> 0.76). The meta-analysis with a pooled sample size of 1,016 patients revealed the highest proportion of right-identified OPLL subtypes in the mixed- and continuous subtypes (0.93 and 0.87). Accuracy and sensitivity of DLM were higher in the upper compared to the lower cervical spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limitations in methodological variations and deep learning challenges, the findings support integrating these models into diagnostic protocols. Their robust performance suggests potential value in clinical practice, offering improved diagnostic accuracy and enhanced subtype differentiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"1719-1740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a significant contributor for unintentional durotomy following anterior spinal surgery, neural compression, and cervical myelopathy. While traditional diagnostic methods like plain radiography are commonly used, they may yield false negatives. The diagnostic accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence methods for detecting this condition remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the performance of deep learning models (DLMs) in diagnosing and predicting cervical OPLL.

Methods: This systematic review assesses the utilization of DLMs in diagnosing and predicting OPLL. Inclusion criteria were defined as the use of DLM for the diagnosis and prediction of cervical OPLL in adult patients. Databases included PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and BASE. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: Seven studies with a pooled sample size of 3,373 patients were included. The pooled accuracy, area under the curve, sensitivity, and accuracy are 0.93, 0.92, 0.88, and 0.9. DLM demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, outperforming human comparator groups in terms of sensitivity (0.86 vs. 0.77), specificity (0.98 vs. 0.74), and accuracy (0.89 vs. 0.76). The meta-analysis with a pooled sample size of 1,016 patients revealed the highest proportion of right-identified OPLL subtypes in the mixed- and continuous subtypes (0.93 and 0.87). Accuracy and sensitivity of DLM were higher in the upper compared to the lower cervical spine.

Conclusions: Despite limitations in methodological variations and deep learning challenges, the findings support integrating these models into diagnostic protocols. Their robust performance suggests potential value in clinical practice, offering improved diagnostic accuracy and enhanced subtype differentiation.

深度学习识别颈椎后纵韧带骨化:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)是脊柱前路手术、神经压迫和颈椎病后意外硬膜切开术的重要原因。虽然传统的诊断方法,如x线平片是常用的,但它们可能产生假阴性。人工智能方法检测这种情况的诊断准确性和可靠性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究旨在系统评估深度学习模型(DLMs)在诊断和预测颈椎OPLL中的性能。方法:本系统综述评价dlm在OPLL诊断和预测中的应用。纳入标准定义为使用DLM诊断和预测成年患者颈椎OPLL。数据库包括PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect和BASE。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入了7项研究,共纳入了3373例患者。集合准确度、曲线下面积、灵敏度和准确度分别为0.93、0.92、0.88和0.9。DLM表现出优越的诊断性能,在敏感性(0.86比0.77)、特异性(0.98比0.74)和准确性(0.89比0.76)方面优于人类比较组。对1016例患者的荟萃分析显示,在混合亚型和连续亚型中,正确识别的OPLL亚型所占比例最高(0.93和0.87)。与下颈椎相比,上颈椎DLM的准确性和敏感性更高。结论:尽管在方法变化和深度学习挑战方面存在局限性,但研究结果支持将这些模型整合到诊断方案中。其强大的性能表明在临床实践中的潜在价值,提供提高诊断准确性和加强亚型区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信