Effect of Mobile Health Interventions in the Heart Failure Patient During the Hospital-to-Home Transition Period Versus Usual Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Diana Marcela Achury Saldaña, David Andrade-Fonseca, Andrés Daniel Gallego-Ardila, María Elisa Moreno Fergusson, Esperanza Peña Torres, Martin Rondón Sepúlveda
{"title":"Effect of Mobile Health Interventions in the Heart Failure Patient During the Hospital-to-Home Transition Period Versus Usual Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Diana Marcela Achury Saldaña, David Andrade-Fonseca, Andrés Daniel Gallego-Ardila, María Elisa Moreno Fergusson, Esperanza Peña Torres, Martin Rondón Sepúlveda","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining adherence to a long-term lifestyle in heart failure patients is challenging, highlighting the importance of mobile health educational interventions from hospitalization to discharge. This study assessed the effects of mobile health interventions on heart failure patients during the transition from hospital to home through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Studies with mobile health interventions starting postdischarge were excluded. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations strategy were used to assess bias. The results indicated that mobile health interventions were not effective in reducing readmissions compared with conventional management after 30 days (relative risk, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.24). No improvements were found in quality of life or self-care. However, a reduction in mortality was observed (relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.9). The study showed that mobile health interventions can reduce mortality in heart failure patients and may reduce late readmissions and improve quality of life over a period longer than 6 months. Longer follow-up studies are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maintaining adherence to a long-term lifestyle in heart failure patients is challenging, highlighting the importance of mobile health educational interventions from hospitalization to discharge. This study assessed the effects of mobile health interventions on heart failure patients during the transition from hospital to home through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Studies with mobile health interventions starting postdischarge were excluded. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations strategy were used to assess bias. The results indicated that mobile health interventions were not effective in reducing readmissions compared with conventional management after 30 days (relative risk, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.24). No improvements were found in quality of life or self-care. However, a reduction in mortality was observed (relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.9). The study showed that mobile health interventions can reduce mortality in heart failure patients and may reduce late readmissions and improve quality of life over a period longer than 6 months. Longer follow-up studies are necessary.

移动医疗干预对从医院到家庭过渡时期心衰患者与常规护理的影响:系统回顾和meta分析
在心力衰竭患者中维持长期的生活方式是具有挑战性的,这突出了从住院到出院的流动健康教育干预的重要性。本研究通过使用PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了移动医疗干预对从医院转到家庭的心力衰竭患者的影响。排除出院后开始的流动卫生干预的研究。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2和推荐、评估、发展和评价分级策略来评估偏倚。结果表明,与常规管理相比,移动卫生干预在减少30天后再入院率方面没有效果(相对危险度为1.04;95%置信区间0.87-1.24)。在生活质量和自我保健方面没有发现任何改善。然而,观察到死亡率降低(相对危险度,0.64;95%置信区间为0.42-0.9)。研究表明,流动卫生干预可以降低心力衰竭患者的死亡率,并可能减少晚期再入院,并改善超过6个月的生活质量。更长的随访研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信