Improved visualization of electron-density dual-energy computed tomography for lumbar disc disease over the standard gray-scale type and virtual noncalcium imaging.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1760
Pengfeng Sun, Xiaoping Wu, Ming Gao, Xiaoyue Zhang, Duo Ma, Hongsheng Liu, Qiaoying Zhang, Jiayu Wu, Mingyue Ma, Yan Dong, Run Liu
{"title":"Improved visualization of electron-density dual-energy computed tomography for lumbar disc disease over the standard gray-scale type and virtual noncalcium imaging.","authors":"Pengfeng Sun, Xiaoping Wu, Ming Gao, Xiaoyue Zhang, Duo Ma, Hongsheng Liu, Qiaoying Zhang, Jiayu Wu, Mingyue Ma, Yan Dong, Run Liu","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances tissue imaging characterization. However, no studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of electron density (ED) for simultaneously displaying the lumbar disc and disc calcification. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the ability of ED to visualize lumbar disc disease as compared with standard computed tomography (SC) and virtual noncalcium (VNCa) imaging in order to provide a viable alternative for lumbar disc disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to February 2024, we retrospectively analyzed data from 53 patients who underwent DECT and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 2 weeks. The randomized SC, VNCa, and ED image sets were independently evaluated by four radiologists for visualization of the lumbar disc and disc calcification with an 8-week interval. Final disc calcification results were obtained by consensus, with the SC results serving as the reference standard. Two other experienced radiologists performed MRI evaluations as the lumbar disc reference standard. Diagnostic performance was compared for each image.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 298 included lumbar discs, 183 lumbar disc herniations and bulges were revealed on MRI. As compared with VNCa and SC, ED showed higher overall sensitivity (91.3% <i>vs.</i> 88.9% <i>vs.</i> 78.0%), specificity (94.8% <i>vs.</i> 93.3% <i>vs.</i> 88.0%), and accuracy (92.6% <i>vs.</i> 90.6% <i>vs.</i> 81.9%) in visualizing lumbar disc herniation and bulging. The ED area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of VNCa and SC (all P values <0.05), and ED identified all 40 (40/183) calcified discs shown on SC. In addition, diagnostic confidence and image quality of ED were higher than those of VNCa and SC (all P values <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy and confidence for visualizing the lumbar disc and disc calcification on the computed tomography (CT) images as compared to VNCa and SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"2296-2308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances tissue imaging characterization. However, no studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of electron density (ED) for simultaneously displaying the lumbar disc and disc calcification. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the ability of ED to visualize lumbar disc disease as compared with standard computed tomography (SC) and virtual noncalcium (VNCa) imaging in order to provide a viable alternative for lumbar disc disease.

Methods: From October 2023 to February 2024, we retrospectively analyzed data from 53 patients who underwent DECT and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 2 weeks. The randomized SC, VNCa, and ED image sets were independently evaluated by four radiologists for visualization of the lumbar disc and disc calcification with an 8-week interval. Final disc calcification results were obtained by consensus, with the SC results serving as the reference standard. Two other experienced radiologists performed MRI evaluations as the lumbar disc reference standard. Diagnostic performance was compared for each image.

Results: Among the 298 included lumbar discs, 183 lumbar disc herniations and bulges were revealed on MRI. As compared with VNCa and SC, ED showed higher overall sensitivity (91.3% vs. 88.9% vs. 78.0%), specificity (94.8% vs. 93.3% vs. 88.0%), and accuracy (92.6% vs. 90.6% vs. 81.9%) in visualizing lumbar disc herniation and bulging. The ED area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of VNCa and SC (all P values <0.05), and ED identified all 40 (40/183) calcified discs shown on SC. In addition, diagnostic confidence and image quality of ED were higher than those of VNCa and SC (all P values <0.001).

Conclusions: ED demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy and confidence for visualizing the lumbar disc and disc calcification on the computed tomography (CT) images as compared to VNCa and SC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信