Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound for Identifying the Different Degrees of Hepatic Steatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background: MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), controlled attenuation parameters (CAP), and attenuation coefficients (AC) are capable of steatosis characterization and may be useful as noninvasive alternatives for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.

Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of MRI-PDFF, CAP, and AC in grading hepatic steatosis, using histology as the reference standard.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases until June 2024. The quality of eligible studies was assessed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis, subgroup analysis, and Deeks' test were performed to explore heterogeneity and assess publication bias.

Results: This meta-analysis included 38 studies with 5056 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The AUC values for grading steatosis ≥S1, ≥S2, and ≥S3 were 0.99, 0.89, and 0.90 for MRI-PDFF, 0.95, 0.84, and 0.77 for CAP, and 0.97, 0.90, and 0.89 for AC, respectively. CAP demonstrated lower accuracy for detecting steatosis grades ≥S2 and ≥S3 compared to MRI-PDFF (0.89 vs. 0.84, p<0.001; 0.90 vs. 0.77, p<0.001) and AC (0.90 vs. 0.84, p<0.001; 0.89 vs. 0.77, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that MRI-PDFF and CAP exhibited superior diagnostic performance in diagnosing ≥S2 and ≥S3 steatosis among individuals in Asia, with a body mass index ≤30 kg/m², and age <51 years.

Conclusion: A direct comparison with CAP showed greater accuracy for MRI-PDFF and AC in diagnosing moderate and severe steatosis, and similar diagnostic performance for MRI-PDFF and AC. For patients with steatosis, AC should be incorporated into routine ultrasound screening.