New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Annabelle Law, Melissa Oxlad
{"title":"New Frontiers in Reproductive Health: Australians' Support for Uterus Transplantation.","authors":"Annabelle Law, Melissa Oxlad","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility is a global public health concern, and as a result, fertility treatments continue to evolve. Uterus transplantation is a novel procedure where a healthy donor uterus is transplanted into an individual without a functioning uterus who desires pregnancy, allowing them to participate in the genetic, gestational and social components of parenthood. Previous studies in several countries have investigated their population's views regarding uterus transplants to aid in awareness and understanding. However, Australians' views have not been explored outside the absolute uterine factor infertility community.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to examine Australians' support for uterus transplantation and the factors associated with higher support for the procedure's availability, Medicare subsidisation and ethical acceptance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (N = 349, aged 17-68) completed an online cross-sectional survey comprising demographics, fertility and transplant history and perceptions of uterus transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most Australians supported uterus transplantation availability (84.5%), subsidisation (67.3%) and ethical acceptance (73.3%). Male gender, non-university education, younger age, high parenthood importance and higher beliefs that the procedure is safe for the recipient, donor and infant/child predicted higher support for availability. Higher beliefs in uterus transplantation being safe for the recipient predicted higher support for subsidisation. Male gender and increased parenthood importance predicted higher levels of ethical acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite ethical complexities surrounding the procedure, Australians were generally supportive of uterus transplantation. While our findings may inform future policies about uterus transplantation, research examining public perceptions over time, with the birth of more children and health professionals' perceptions, would be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a global public health concern, and as a result, fertility treatments continue to evolve. Uterus transplantation is a novel procedure where a healthy donor uterus is transplanted into an individual without a functioning uterus who desires pregnancy, allowing them to participate in the genetic, gestational and social components of parenthood. Previous studies in several countries have investigated their population's views regarding uterus transplants to aid in awareness and understanding. However, Australians' views have not been explored outside the absolute uterine factor infertility community.

Aims: We aimed to examine Australians' support for uterus transplantation and the factors associated with higher support for the procedure's availability, Medicare subsidisation and ethical acceptance.

Materials and methods: Participants (N = 349, aged 17-68) completed an online cross-sectional survey comprising demographics, fertility and transplant history and perceptions of uterus transplantation.

Results: Most Australians supported uterus transplantation availability (84.5%), subsidisation (67.3%) and ethical acceptance (73.3%). Male gender, non-university education, younger age, high parenthood importance and higher beliefs that the procedure is safe for the recipient, donor and infant/child predicted higher support for availability. Higher beliefs in uterus transplantation being safe for the recipient predicted higher support for subsidisation. Male gender and increased parenthood importance predicted higher levels of ethical acceptance.

Conclusions: Despite ethical complexities surrounding the procedure, Australians were generally supportive of uterus transplantation. While our findings may inform future policies about uterus transplantation, research examining public perceptions over time, with the birth of more children and health professionals' perceptions, would be beneficial.

生殖健康新领域:澳大利亚人对子宫移植的支持。
背景:不孕症是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,因此,生育治疗方法也在不断发展。子宫移植是一种新颖的手术,它将健康的供体子宫移植到没有功能子宫但渴望怀孕的人体内,使他们能够在遗传、妊娠和社会方面参与为人父母的过程。此前在多个国家进行的研究已经调查了当地居民对子宫移植的看法,以帮助人们认识和了解子宫移植。目的:我们旨在研究澳大利亚人对子宫移植的支持度,以及与该手术的可用性、医疗保险补贴和伦理接受度相关的因素:参与者(N = 349,年龄在17-68岁之间)完成了一项在线横断面调查,内容包括人口统计学、生育和移植史以及对子宫移植的看法:大多数澳大利亚人支持子宫移植的可用性(84.5%)、补贴(67.3%)和伦理认可度(73.3%)。男性性别、非大学教育程度、年龄较小、为人父母的重要性较高,以及更相信该手术对受者、捐献者和婴儿/儿童是安全的,这些都预示着更多人支持提供子宫移植。认为子宫移植对受者安全的人越多,则越支持提供补贴。男性性别和为人父母的重要性越高,则伦理接受度越高:尽管子宫移植手术存在复杂的伦理问题,但澳大利亚人普遍支持子宫移植手术。虽然我们的研究结果可能会为未来的子宫移植政策提供参考,但随着时间的推移,随着更多孩子的出生和医疗专业人员的看法,对公众看法的研究将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信