The semiquantitative assessment of metacarpal head cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis via ultrahigh frequency ultrasound.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1539
Xiu Zheng, Bihui Zhu, Yuanjiao Tang, Xinyi Tang, Min Li, Bingjie Liu, Li Qiu
{"title":"The semiquantitative assessment of metacarpal head cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis via ultrahigh frequency ultrasound.","authors":"Xiu Zheng, Bihui Zhu, Yuanjiao Tang, Xinyi Tang, Min Li, Bingjie Liu, Li Qiu","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by proliferative synovitis. Articular cartilage damage is an early stage of joint damage and is difficult to repair as the disease progresses, exerting a severely negative impact on the quality of life of patients with RA. In early RA, the vulnerable areas include the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and the wrist. Metacarpal head (MH) cartilage damage appears to be prevalent in the second and third fingers on the semiquantitative assessment of MCP 2-5 cartilage in patients with RA, but the specific portions of cartilage damaged in each of these sections has not been examined. Moreover, few studies have compared the efficacy of the two scoring methods in assessing RA cartilage via ultrahigh frequency ultrasound (UHFUS). The aim of this study was to investigate the common sites of MH cartilage damage in patients with RA and compare various semiquantitative scoring methods for evaluating MH cartilage in patients with RA using UHFUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a total of 2,200 dorsal cartilages of the MH in 110 patients with RA and 110 healthy controls were included and scanned in both the transverse and longitudinal sections via UHFUS. Cartilage damage in the MH was assessed using the three- and five-grade semiquantitative scoring systems. The Cochran Q test was used to evaluate the various damage locations, and the chi-square test was employed to compare the positive detection rates of the two scoring techniques. The correlation between semiquantitative evaluation results and clinical and laboratory indicators was determined via Spearman correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rate of impairment on the five-grade scoring system was higher than that on the three-grade scoring system. The rate of impairment on the five-grade scoring system of the transverse and longitudinal sections was 24.18% and 17.00%, respectively. The rate of impairment on three-grade scoring system of the transverse and longitudinal sections was 18.18% and 13.18%, respectively. Additionally, cartilage damage was more common in the transverse sections than in the longitudinal sections, with the most commonly afflicted regions being the ulnar side of the transverse sections and the distal side of the longitudinal sections. The rate of cartilage damage on the ulnar and distal side was 7.20% and 6.30%, respectively. Cartilage damage was weakly positively correlated with age, duration of disease, weight, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using CRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The five-grade semiquantitative scoring system for UHFUS demonstrated reliability for detecting MH cartilage damage in RA. The MCP cartilage of the ulnar and distal sides are particularly susceptible to injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"1927-1937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by proliferative synovitis. Articular cartilage damage is an early stage of joint damage and is difficult to repair as the disease progresses, exerting a severely negative impact on the quality of life of patients with RA. In early RA, the vulnerable areas include the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and the wrist. Metacarpal head (MH) cartilage damage appears to be prevalent in the second and third fingers on the semiquantitative assessment of MCP 2-5 cartilage in patients with RA, but the specific portions of cartilage damaged in each of these sections has not been examined. Moreover, few studies have compared the efficacy of the two scoring methods in assessing RA cartilage via ultrahigh frequency ultrasound (UHFUS). The aim of this study was to investigate the common sites of MH cartilage damage in patients with RA and compare various semiquantitative scoring methods for evaluating MH cartilage in patients with RA using UHFUS.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 2,200 dorsal cartilages of the MH in 110 patients with RA and 110 healthy controls were included and scanned in both the transverse and longitudinal sections via UHFUS. Cartilage damage in the MH was assessed using the three- and five-grade semiquantitative scoring systems. The Cochran Q test was used to evaluate the various damage locations, and the chi-square test was employed to compare the positive detection rates of the two scoring techniques. The correlation between semiquantitative evaluation results and clinical and laboratory indicators was determined via Spearman correlation analysis.

Results: Rate of impairment on the five-grade scoring system was higher than that on the three-grade scoring system. The rate of impairment on the five-grade scoring system of the transverse and longitudinal sections was 24.18% and 17.00%, respectively. The rate of impairment on three-grade scoring system of the transverse and longitudinal sections was 18.18% and 13.18%, respectively. Additionally, cartilage damage was more common in the transverse sections than in the longitudinal sections, with the most commonly afflicted regions being the ulnar side of the transverse sections and the distal side of the longitudinal sections. The rate of cartilage damage on the ulnar and distal side was 7.20% and 6.30%, respectively. Cartilage damage was weakly positively correlated with age, duration of disease, weight, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using CRP.

Conclusions: The five-grade semiquantitative scoring system for UHFUS demonstrated reliability for detecting MH cartilage damage in RA. The MCP cartilage of the ulnar and distal sides are particularly susceptible to injury.

超高频超声半定量评价类风湿关节炎掌骨头软骨损伤。
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种以增生性滑膜炎为特征的全身自身免疫性炎症性疾病。关节软骨损伤是关节损伤的早期阶段,随着病情的发展难以修复,严重影响RA患者的生活质量。早期RA的易损部位包括掌指关节(MCP)、近端指间关节(PIP)和手腕。在类风湿关节炎患者MCP - 2-5软骨的半定量评估中,掌骨头(MH)软骨损伤似乎普遍存在于第二和第三指,但尚未检查每个部分软骨损伤的具体部分。此外,很少有研究比较两种评分方法在超高频超声(UHFUS)评估RA软骨的疗效。本研究的目的是探讨类风湿关节炎患者MH软骨损伤的常见部位,并比较各种半定量评分方法对类风湿关节炎患者MH软骨的UHFUS评估。方法:在本横断面研究中,共包括110例RA患者和110例健康对照者的2,200个MH背软骨,并通过UHFUS进行横切面和纵切面扫描。使用三级和五级半定量评分系统评估MH软骨损伤。采用Cochran Q检验评价各损伤部位,采用卡方检验比较两种评分方法的阳性检出率。通过Spearman相关分析确定半定量评价结果与临床及实验室指标的相关性。结果:五级评分法的减值率高于三级评分法。横断面和纵断面五级评分系统的损伤率分别为24.18%和17.00%。横断面和纵断面三级评分系统的损伤率分别为18.18%和13.18%。此外,软骨损伤在横切面比在纵切面更常见,最常见的受累区域是横切面的尺侧和纵切面的远侧。尺侧和远侧软骨损伤率分别为7.20%和6.30%。软骨损伤与年龄、病程、体重、体重指数(BMI)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、疾病活动评分28 (DAS28)呈弱正相关。结论:UHFUS的五级半定量评分系统对类风湿关节炎MH软骨损伤的检测是可靠的。尺骨和远侧的MCP软骨特别容易受伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信