Exploration of digital health literacy among community members and healthcare teams in the deep south: A quasi-experimental study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251325581
Gabrielle B Rocque, Nicole L Henderson, Keyonsis Hildreth, Noon Eltoum, Omari Whitlow, Loretta Herring, Stacey Ingram, Daniel I Chu, Connie C Shao, Claudia Hardy, Timiya S Nolan, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Courtney P Williams
{"title":"Exploration of digital health literacy among community members and healthcare teams in the deep south: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Gabrielle B Rocque, Nicole L Henderson, Keyonsis Hildreth, Noon Eltoum, Omari Whitlow, Loretta Herring, Stacey Ingram, Daniel I Chu, Connie C Shao, Claudia Hardy, Timiya S Nolan, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Courtney P Williams","doi":"10.1177/20552076251325581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given increasing technology reliance, there is a need for a deeper understanding of individual and community-level comfort with technology as it pertains to basic and more complex healthcare-related skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to engage participants in conversations about digital health literacy to facilitate awareness and to compare digital health literacy for community members, healthcare providers, non-clinical navigators, and community health advisors and county coordinators (henceforth referred to as CHAs) in the Deep South (AL, MS, FL). Interactive community conversations on digital health literacy were given in community (n = 16) and clinical (n = 5) settings. Participants completed pre- and post- surveys assessing personal comfort performing technological tasks on a 5-point scale. Mixed models estimated both within- and between-role changes in self-reported comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 248 participants, 56% were community members, 18% healthcare providers, 17% CHAs, and 8% non-clinical navigators. Community members had the lowest personal comfort performing every task assessed (all p < .05). In the pre-test, the largest differences in reported personal comfort performing tasks were seen for basic skills including scanning QR codes (mean comfort score: community members 2.7 [SD 1.5] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001) and sharing a website (mean comfort score: community members 2.9 [SD 1.6] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001). Pre- vs. post-community conversation, community members experienced significant increases in their personal comfort scanning QR codes (β=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.0), creating an online account (general use) (β=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), and using a smartphone (β=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As technological advances continue to be implemented, gaps in digital health literacy must be addressed. Non-clinical navigators may play a future role in teaching patients technology skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251325581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251325581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given increasing technology reliance, there is a need for a deeper understanding of individual and community-level comfort with technology as it pertains to basic and more complex healthcare-related skills.

Methods: The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to engage participants in conversations about digital health literacy to facilitate awareness and to compare digital health literacy for community members, healthcare providers, non-clinical navigators, and community health advisors and county coordinators (henceforth referred to as CHAs) in the Deep South (AL, MS, FL). Interactive community conversations on digital health literacy were given in community (n = 16) and clinical (n = 5) settings. Participants completed pre- and post- surveys assessing personal comfort performing technological tasks on a 5-point scale. Mixed models estimated both within- and between-role changes in self-reported comfort.

Results: Of 248 participants, 56% were community members, 18% healthcare providers, 17% CHAs, and 8% non-clinical navigators. Community members had the lowest personal comfort performing every task assessed (all p < .05). In the pre-test, the largest differences in reported personal comfort performing tasks were seen for basic skills including scanning QR codes (mean comfort score: community members 2.7 [SD 1.5] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001) and sharing a website (mean comfort score: community members 2.9 [SD 1.6] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001). Pre- vs. post-community conversation, community members experienced significant increases in their personal comfort scanning QR codes (β=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.0), creating an online account (general use) (β=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), and using a smartphone (β=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5).

Conclusions: As technological advances continue to be implemented, gaps in digital health literacy must be addressed. Non-clinical navigators may play a future role in teaching patients technology skills.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信