{"title":"Exploring Australian Women's Attitudes Towards Paid Menstrual Leave: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Amy Wong, Melissa Oxlad, Deborah Turnbull","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australian lawyers, researchers and unions are advocating for the implementation of national paid menstrual leave legislation. The scarce research in this emerging field has not thoroughly explored women's attitudes towards such leave.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore Australian women's attitudes towards paid menstrual leave.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (n = 923, female sex assigned at birth currently or previously menstruating; 18+ years; resident in Australia; fluent in English) primarily recruited via social media, including accounts of Australian women's health and menstruation support groups for conditions such as adenomyosis and endometriosis, using a passive snowball sampling frame, completed an online cross-sectional mixed-methods survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (85%) expressed being somewhat to definitely in favour of paid menstrual leave, 4% were unsure and 11% were somewhat to definitely not in favour. Younger age and history of missing work due to menstrual pain were significant independent predictors of support for paid menstrual leave. Women preferred menstrual leave to be paid (rather than unpaid or reimbursed as additional income if unused), available monthly, with a once-off doctor's approval required to access leave. Overall, 73% of participants reported positive impacts on employees in response to open-ended questions about potential impacts (positive, negative and unintended). The most common categories were better workplaces and productivity and improved work outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research such as this is essential for informing considerations about menstrual leave legislation. Further research investigating the attitudes of a wider range of stakeholders, such as men, colleagues, employers, employment lawyers and economists, is needed to develop an inclusive understanding of menstrual leave.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Australian lawyers, researchers and unions are advocating for the implementation of national paid menstrual leave legislation. The scarce research in this emerging field has not thoroughly explored women's attitudes towards such leave.
Aim: To explore Australian women's attitudes towards paid menstrual leave.
Materials and methods: Participants (n = 923, female sex assigned at birth currently or previously menstruating; 18+ years; resident in Australia; fluent in English) primarily recruited via social media, including accounts of Australian women's health and menstruation support groups for conditions such as adenomyosis and endometriosis, using a passive snowball sampling frame, completed an online cross-sectional mixed-methods survey.
Results: Most (85%) expressed being somewhat to definitely in favour of paid menstrual leave, 4% were unsure and 11% were somewhat to definitely not in favour. Younger age and history of missing work due to menstrual pain were significant independent predictors of support for paid menstrual leave. Women preferred menstrual leave to be paid (rather than unpaid or reimbursed as additional income if unused), available monthly, with a once-off doctor's approval required to access leave. Overall, 73% of participants reported positive impacts on employees in response to open-ended questions about potential impacts (positive, negative and unintended). The most common categories were better workplaces and productivity and improved work outcomes.
Conclusion: Research such as this is essential for informing considerations about menstrual leave legislation. Further research investigating the attitudes of a wider range of stakeholders, such as men, colleagues, employers, employment lawyers and economists, is needed to develop an inclusive understanding of menstrual leave.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.