Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Ying Xue, Robert Block, Rebecca G Tucker, Mary G Carey
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Heart Failure Subtypes Presenting at Emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure Management.","authors":"Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Ying Xue, Robert Block, Rebecca G Tucker, Mary G Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients' characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses' recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients' characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.
Results: Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).
Discussion: HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses' recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.