The Role of Preoperative Factors, Surgical Approach, Mobilization Protocol for Improved Surgical Outcomes after Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness - An Ambispective Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nikku Mathew Geevarughese, Srinavasa Rao Polisetty, Yogesh A Kothari, Manjula Anil Kunder, Anil K Bhat
{"title":"The Role of Preoperative Factors, Surgical Approach, Mobilization Protocol for Improved Surgical Outcomes after Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness - An Ambispective Cohort Study.","authors":"Nikku Mathew Geevarughese, Srinavasa Rao Polisetty, Yogesh A Kothari, Manjula Anil Kunder, Anil K Bhat","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic elbow stiffness decreases the range of movements (ROM) and limits functional activities of the upper limb. Post-injury therapy and splints have been used to improve the ROM. Despite this, surgical release is required in several instances. Surgical approaches to open arthrolysis vary. However, the medial approach has been less discussed. Multiple factors impact prognosis, final ROM, and functional outcomes after arthrolysis. The objectives of this study were to analyze functional outcomes following open elbow arthrolysis, outline post-injury and postoperative mobilization protocol implemented, the role of the medial approach, and identify preoperative factors contributing towards favorable functional outcomes in post-traumatic elbow stiffness treated by open elbow arthrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center ambispective cohort study, we retrospectively recruited a cohort of post-traumatic elbow stiffness patients. They were placed in a structured preoperative therapy and splinting program. Those persisting with moderate to severe stiffness 3 to 6 months following the therapy underwent open elbow arthrolysis. A prospective study was done to evaluate the functional outcomes, pain, stability, and range of movements after elbow arthrolysis. The effect of the medial approach was evaluated for surgical outcomes. Clinical significance by minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and statistical significance of various preoperative factors for improved ROM and functional outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94 patients with post-traumatic stiffness underwent the structured preoperative rehabilitation protocol. The severity of stiffness was downgraded with therapy in 39 patients, and the remaining 55 patients underwent open elbow arthrolysis. At a mean follow-up of 76.6±40.4 months, the mean gain in arc of motion from preop was 54°±32°, and the mean ROM at final follow-up was 88°±30° (p=0.026). An isolated medial approach was performed in 65.5%. The mean improvement in arc of motion with the isolated medial approach was 51°±28° and 45°±34° with the combined medial-lateral approach. The severity of preoperative stiffness showed statistical significance in improvement in arc of motion and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p=0.033), while the interval from trauma to surgery was shown to be clinically significant by MCID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured preoperative rehabilitation protocol downgrades the severity of elbow stiffness. The open elbow arthrolysis significantly improves arc of motion and MEPS. The medial approach demonstrates an improved arc of motion compared to combined and posterior approaches. The severity of preoperative stiffness and interval from trauma to surgery have a significant correlation to improvement in arc of motion and MEPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness decreases the range of movements (ROM) and limits functional activities of the upper limb. Post-injury therapy and splints have been used to improve the ROM. Despite this, surgical release is required in several instances. Surgical approaches to open arthrolysis vary. However, the medial approach has been less discussed. Multiple factors impact prognosis, final ROM, and functional outcomes after arthrolysis. The objectives of this study were to analyze functional outcomes following open elbow arthrolysis, outline post-injury and postoperative mobilization protocol implemented, the role of the medial approach, and identify preoperative factors contributing towards favorable functional outcomes in post-traumatic elbow stiffness treated by open elbow arthrolysis.

Methods: In this single-center ambispective cohort study, we retrospectively recruited a cohort of post-traumatic elbow stiffness patients. They were placed in a structured preoperative therapy and splinting program. Those persisting with moderate to severe stiffness 3 to 6 months following the therapy underwent open elbow arthrolysis. A prospective study was done to evaluate the functional outcomes, pain, stability, and range of movements after elbow arthrolysis. The effect of the medial approach was evaluated for surgical outcomes. Clinical significance by minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and statistical significance of various preoperative factors for improved ROM and functional outcomes were evaluated.

Results: 94 patients with post-traumatic stiffness underwent the structured preoperative rehabilitation protocol. The severity of stiffness was downgraded with therapy in 39 patients, and the remaining 55 patients underwent open elbow arthrolysis. At a mean follow-up of 76.6±40.4 months, the mean gain in arc of motion from preop was 54°±32°, and the mean ROM at final follow-up was 88°±30° (p=0.026). An isolated medial approach was performed in 65.5%. The mean improvement in arc of motion with the isolated medial approach was 51°±28° and 45°±34° with the combined medial-lateral approach. The severity of preoperative stiffness showed statistical significance in improvement in arc of motion and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p=0.033), while the interval from trauma to surgery was shown to be clinically significant by MCID.

Conclusions: Structured preoperative rehabilitation protocol downgrades the severity of elbow stiffness. The open elbow arthrolysis significantly improves arc of motion and MEPS. The medial approach demonstrates an improved arc of motion compared to combined and posterior approaches. The severity of preoperative stiffness and interval from trauma to surgery have a significant correlation to improvement in arc of motion and MEPS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信