Performance Comparison Between Hounsfield Units and DXA in Predicting Lumbar Cage Subsidence in the Degenerative Population.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lindsay D Orosz, Kirsten A Schuler, Brandon J Allen, Wondwossen T Lerebo, Tarek Yamout, Rita T Roy, Thomas C Schuler, Christopher R Good, Colin M Haines, Ehsan Jazini
{"title":"Performance Comparison Between Hounsfield Units and DXA in Predicting Lumbar Cage Subsidence in the Degenerative Population.","authors":"Lindsay D Orosz, Kirsten A Schuler, Brandon J Allen, Wondwossen T Lerebo, Tarek Yamout, Rita T Roy, Thomas C Schuler, Christopher R Good, Colin M Haines, Ehsan Jazini","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Bone mineral density assessment is essential for surgical planning for most spine surgeries, but gold standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is affected by degeneration often resulting in falsely elevated scores. Studies of the opportunistic measurement of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU) suggest lower CTHU values predict interbody cage subsidence, yet cutoff values vary and lack standardization.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine if value CTHU<135 was associated with lumbar interbody cage subsidence and to compare the predictive performance of subsidence between CTHU and DXA.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: : Adult, circumferential lumbar fusions ≤ 5 interbody levels with DXA, CTs, radiographs, and at least 1 year of follow up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>CTHU at L1, lowest DXA T-score, and postoperative change in disc space height (cage migration) on radiographs METHODS: : Lowest DXA T-scores overall and of the lumbar spine were recorded and categorized, and L1 CTHUs were measured. Interbody fusions were analyzed for subsidence ≥ 2mm on radiographs by a validated, computer vision algorithmic approach. Analysis determined if an association existed between subsidence and CTHU<135 or DXA lowest T-score. Logistic regression analyzed the performance of predicting subsidence by each method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 127-patient cohort had 82.7% degenerative pathologies, 45.7% males, median age of 60 years, 2.4% osteoporosis on DXA, 44.1% CTHU<135, and 13.4% subsidence. CTHU<135 (p=0.004) and age (p=0.016) were significantly associated with subsidence, however DXA lowest T-score (p=0.550) was not. The odds of subsidence were significant if CTHU<135 for crude and adjusted (OR=4.0, 95% CI 1.2-13.9, p=0.029) comparisons. The odds of subsidence were not significant for DXA<sub>any</sub> lowest T-score or DXA<sub>spine</sub> lowest T-score (OR=1.8, 95% CI 0.6-4.9, p=0.284 and OR=1.1, 95% CI 0.3-4.1, p=0.920, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTHU<135 was associated with subsidence while DXA lowest T-score was not in this study of patients with degenerative pathologies. The odds of subsidence were 4.0 times higher for CTHU<135 after controlling for known risks, supporting this cutoff value. This study suggests that CTHU is a more reliable predictor of subsidence than DXA in this primarily degenerative population and is a useful tool for assessing bone quality at the region of interest when planning lumbar surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Bone mineral density assessment is essential for surgical planning for most spine surgeries, but gold standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is affected by degeneration often resulting in falsely elevated scores. Studies of the opportunistic measurement of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU) suggest lower CTHU values predict interbody cage subsidence, yet cutoff values vary and lack standardization.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine if value CTHU<135 was associated with lumbar interbody cage subsidence and to compare the predictive performance of subsidence between CTHU and DXA.

Study design/setting: Single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: : Adult, circumferential lumbar fusions ≤ 5 interbody levels with DXA, CTs, radiographs, and at least 1 year of follow up.

Outcome measures: CTHU at L1, lowest DXA T-score, and postoperative change in disc space height (cage migration) on radiographs METHODS: : Lowest DXA T-scores overall and of the lumbar spine were recorded and categorized, and L1 CTHUs were measured. Interbody fusions were analyzed for subsidence ≥ 2mm on radiographs by a validated, computer vision algorithmic approach. Analysis determined if an association existed between subsidence and CTHU<135 or DXA lowest T-score. Logistic regression analyzed the performance of predicting subsidence by each method.

Results: The 127-patient cohort had 82.7% degenerative pathologies, 45.7% males, median age of 60 years, 2.4% osteoporosis on DXA, 44.1% CTHU<135, and 13.4% subsidence. CTHU<135 (p=0.004) and age (p=0.016) were significantly associated with subsidence, however DXA lowest T-score (p=0.550) was not. The odds of subsidence were significant if CTHU<135 for crude and adjusted (OR=4.0, 95% CI 1.2-13.9, p=0.029) comparisons. The odds of subsidence were not significant for DXAany lowest T-score or DXAspine lowest T-score (OR=1.8, 95% CI 0.6-4.9, p=0.284 and OR=1.1, 95% CI 0.3-4.1, p=0.920, respectively).

Conclusion: CTHU<135 was associated with subsidence while DXA lowest T-score was not in this study of patients with degenerative pathologies. The odds of subsidence were 4.0 times higher for CTHU<135 after controlling for known risks, supporting this cutoff value. This study suggests that CTHU is a more reliable predictor of subsidence than DXA in this primarily degenerative population and is a useful tool for assessing bone quality at the region of interest when planning lumbar surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信