Deepening Empirical Understandings of Nurse Work Well-Being: Using Mixed Methods Including Path Analysis to Create Contextualized Outcome Models.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
John W Nelson, Dominika Vrbnjak, Patricia L Thomas, Cathy I Schwartz
{"title":"Deepening Empirical Understandings of Nurse Work Well-Being: Using Mixed Methods Including Path Analysis to Create Contextualized Outcome Models.","authors":"John W Nelson, Dominika Vrbnjak, Patricia L Thomas, Cathy I Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/wvn.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This 2022-2023 study across nine countries builds on a 2019-2021 ten-country study exploring nurse work well-being (WWB) and its associated outcomes. WWB, as assessed using the Profile of Caring (PoC) survey, is conceptualized as a multifactorial construct encompassing caring for self, caring of manager, clarity of role/system, and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore relationships between WWB and staff outcomes by evaluating the PoC construct validity within an international nursing population in the post-pandemic context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nursing staff (n = 2546) from 128 facilities participated. Mixed methods, including thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, regression analyses, and path analysis, were employed to develop a WWB outcome model. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model had good model fit, explaining 76% of nurse WWB. Feeling rewarded for work well done, total direct effect had a positive relationship with job satisfaction (β = 0.415, p = < 0.001) and a negative effect on intent to leave (β = -0.242, p = 0.003). Job satisfaction total direct effect negatively related to intent to leave (β = -0.584, p = < 0.001). Relationship direction, strength, and significance varied by country. Caring of manager explained one-third of WWB. Job satisfaction subscales explained intent to leave (25.2%). The PoC showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.80), and robust construct validity was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis (KMO = 0.950, factor loadings ≥ 0.40).</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Conclusions suggest that understanding job satisfaction and intent to leave predictors is complex, requiring complex models to globally and contextually explain nurse WWB outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"22 2","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This 2022-2023 study across nine countries builds on a 2019-2021 ten-country study exploring nurse work well-being (WWB) and its associated outcomes. WWB, as assessed using the Profile of Caring (PoC) survey, is conceptualized as a multifactorial construct encompassing caring for self, caring of manager, clarity of role/system, and job satisfaction.

Aims: To explore relationships between WWB and staff outcomes by evaluating the PoC construct validity within an international nursing population in the post-pandemic context.

Methods: Nursing staff (n = 2546) from 128 facilities participated. Mixed methods, including thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, regression analyses, and path analysis, were employed to develop a WWB outcome model. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis.

Results: The final model had good model fit, explaining 76% of nurse WWB. Feeling rewarded for work well done, total direct effect had a positive relationship with job satisfaction (β = 0.415, p = < 0.001) and a negative effect on intent to leave (β = -0.242, p = 0.003). Job satisfaction total direct effect negatively related to intent to leave (β = -0.584, p = < 0.001). Relationship direction, strength, and significance varied by country. Caring of manager explained one-third of WWB. Job satisfaction subscales explained intent to leave (25.2%). The PoC showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.80), and robust construct validity was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis (KMO = 0.950, factor loadings ≥ 0.40).

Linking evidence to action: Conclusions suggest that understanding job satisfaction and intent to leave predictors is complex, requiring complex models to globally and contextually explain nurse WWB outcomes.

深化对护士工作幸福感的实证理解:使用包括路径分析在内的混合方法创建情境化结果模型。
背景:这项横跨9个国家的2022-2023年研究是在2019-2021年探索护士工作幸福感(WWB)及其相关结果的10国研究的基础上进行的。通过“关怀概况”(PoC)调查评估,员工敬业度被定义为一个多因素结构,包括对自我的关怀、对管理者的关怀、角色/系统的清晰度和工作满意度。目的:通过在大流行后的国际护理人群中评估PoC结构效度,探讨工作负荷与工作人员结果之间的关系。方法:来自128家医院的护理人员2546名参与调查。采用主题分析、描述性统计、回归分析和路径分析等混合方法建立WWB结果模型。信度采用Cronbach’s alpha评估,构念效度采用探索性因子分析评估。结果:最终模型拟合良好,可解释76%的护士尿漏。工作表现良好的感觉奖励,总直接效应与工作满意度呈正相关(β = 0.415, p =证据与行动相联系:结论表明,理解工作满意度和离职意图的预测因素是复杂的,需要复杂的模型来全局和情境地解释护士工作满意度的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信