Incidence and characteristics of noise generation in total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings : a comparison between robotic-assisted surgery and conventional methods.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xianzuo Zhang, Mo Chen, Tao Zhang, Haining Zhang, Bo Yang, Chen Zhu
{"title":"Incidence and characteristics of noise generation in total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings : a comparison between robotic-assisted surgery and conventional methods.","authors":"Xianzuo Zhang, Mo Chen, Tao Zhang, Haining Zhang, Bo Yang, Chen Zhu","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0506.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the impact and risk factors of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) on noise generation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in comparison to conventional (CON) manual methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial - conducted from June 2021 to July 2022 - included 74 patients with CoC bearings, equally divided between RAS and CON groups. Noise incidence, characteristics, and duration were documented. Radiological assessments and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of noise or squeaking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of overall noise complaints was higher in the CON group compared to the RAS group, with a statistically significant difference observed at the early postoperative stage. Specifically, at 14 days post-surgery, 5.4% of patients in the RAS group and 32.4% in the CON group reported noises (p = 0.008), while at 24 weeks, the rates were 5.4% and 21.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.089). RAS showed superior alignment and precision in component placement. Logistic regression analysis identified conventional surgery as a significant predictor of noise complaints (odds ratio 7.10 (95% CI 1.51 to 33.33); p = 0.013). Additionally, the probability distributions of different acetabular alignment and abduction angles were plotted and analyzed. No differences in functional status or patient-reported outcomes were found between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS in THA with CoC bearings reduces the incidence and severity of noise-related complications, and is likely due to more precise and appropriate component placement, which may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 4","pages":"391-403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0506.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the impact and risk factors of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) on noise generation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in comparison to conventional (CON) manual methods.

Methods: A secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial - conducted from June 2021 to July 2022 - included 74 patients with CoC bearings, equally divided between RAS and CON groups. Noise incidence, characteristics, and duration were documented. Radiological assessments and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of noise or squeaking.

Results: The incidence of overall noise complaints was higher in the CON group compared to the RAS group, with a statistically significant difference observed at the early postoperative stage. Specifically, at 14 days post-surgery, 5.4% of patients in the RAS group and 32.4% in the CON group reported noises (p = 0.008), while at 24 weeks, the rates were 5.4% and 21.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.089). RAS showed superior alignment and precision in component placement. Logistic regression analysis identified conventional surgery as a significant predictor of noise complaints (odds ratio 7.10 (95% CI 1.51 to 33.33); p = 0.013). Additionally, the probability distributions of different acetabular alignment and abduction angles were plotted and analyzed. No differences in functional status or patient-reported outcomes were found between groups.

Conclusion: RAS in THA with CoC bearings reduces the incidence and severity of noise-related complications, and is likely due to more precise and appropriate component placement, which may improve outcomes.

陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术中噪声产生的发生率和特征:机器人辅助手术与传统方法的比较。
目的:评估机器人辅助手术(RAS)对陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)轴承全髋关节置换术(THA)中噪声产生的影响和危险因素,并与传统(CON)人工方法进行比较。方法:对一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验进行二次分析,该试验于2021年6月至2022年7月进行,包括74例CoC患者,平均分为RAS组和CON组。记录噪声的发生率、特征和持续时间。进行放射学评估和逻辑回归分析,以确定噪音或吱吱声的预测因素。结果:CON组总体噪音投诉发生率高于RAS组,在术后早期差异有统计学意义。其中,术后14天,RAS组和CON组分别有5.4%和32.4%的患者报告了噪音(p = 0.008),而24周时,RAS组和CON组分别为5.4%和21.6%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.089)。RAS显示了优越的对准和精度的组件放置。Logistic回归分析发现传统手术是噪音投诉的重要预测因素(优势比7.10 (95% CI 1.51至33.33);P = 0.013)。绘制并分析了不同髋臼对准角度和外展角度的概率分布。两组之间在功能状态或患者报告的结果方面没有发现差异。结论:CoC轴承THA中的RAS降低了噪声相关并发症的发生率和严重程度,可能是由于更精确和适当的组件放置,这可能改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信