Robotic arm-assisted acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty : a clinical study with minimum two-year follow-up.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Wang Deng, Xiangdong Wu, Hongyi Shao, Hao Tang, Yong Huang, Zhaolun Wang, Dejin Yang, Yixin Zhou
{"title":"Robotic arm-assisted acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty : a clinical study with minimum two-year follow-up.","authors":"Wang Deng, Xiangdong Wu, Hongyi Shao, Hao Tang, Yong Huang, Zhaolun Wang, Dejin Yang, Yixin Zhou","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0982.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to report the surgical techniques and early clinical results of robotic arm-assisted acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and May 2021, we used the Mako robotic system to perform 62 revision THAs at our hospital. This study included 54 patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted revision THA for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical techniques using the robotic system to reconstruct the acetabulum, including preoperative planning, intraoperative registration, and the accuracy of different registration methods, are reported. The accuracy between the target acetabular component orientation and final orientation was evaluated. The latest follow-up Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 54 hips included, four types of intraoperative registration methods with different surfaces were developed and registered 65 times. The overall success rate of the registration process was 98.5%. The mean accuracy of successful registration was 0.38 mm (0.2 to 0.5). The median difference between the target and final acetabular component orientations assessed by Mako was 1.0° (-2.0° to 0.0°) for inclination and 0.0° (-1.0° to 1.0°) for anteversion. Four hips were classified as outliers for acetabular component orientation. The reconstructed centres of rotation (CORs) were slightly lower than the anatomical CORs by a mean 4.72 mm (SD 4.71), and shifted laterally by 3.92 mm (SD 4.62) on postoperative radiographs. The median HHS improved significantly from 46.0 (IQR 33.0 to 58.3) preoperatively to 89.0 (IQR 78.3 to 93.0) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The overall satisfaction rate was 86.0% (n = 50). There were no radiological failures at the latest follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic arm-assisted revision THA provides valuable information for the analysis of bone defects to guide reconstructive strategies. Robotic arm-assisted reaming and acetabular component or augment positioning facilitates accurate component position and orientation. The radiological and preliminary clinical results of this cohort were satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 4","pages":"404-412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0982.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to report the surgical techniques and early clinical results of robotic arm-assisted acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: Between October 2019 and May 2021, we used the Mako robotic system to perform 62 revision THAs at our hospital. This study included 54 patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted revision THA for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical techniques using the robotic system to reconstruct the acetabulum, including preoperative planning, intraoperative registration, and the accuracy of different registration methods, are reported. The accuracy between the target acetabular component orientation and final orientation was evaluated. The latest follow-up Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were analyzed.

Results: Among the 54 hips included, four types of intraoperative registration methods with different surfaces were developed and registered 65 times. The overall success rate of the registration process was 98.5%. The mean accuracy of successful registration was 0.38 mm (0.2 to 0.5). The median difference between the target and final acetabular component orientations assessed by Mako was 1.0° (-2.0° to 0.0°) for inclination and 0.0° (-1.0° to 1.0°) for anteversion. Four hips were classified as outliers for acetabular component orientation. The reconstructed centres of rotation (CORs) were slightly lower than the anatomical CORs by a mean 4.72 mm (SD 4.71), and shifted laterally by 3.92 mm (SD 4.62) on postoperative radiographs. The median HHS improved significantly from 46.0 (IQR 33.0 to 58.3) preoperatively to 89.0 (IQR 78.3 to 93.0) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The overall satisfaction rate was 86.0% (n = 50). There were no radiological failures at the latest follow-up.

Conclusion: Robotic arm-assisted revision THA provides valuable information for the analysis of bone defects to guide reconstructive strategies. Robotic arm-assisted reaming and acetabular component or augment positioning facilitates accurate component position and orientation. The radiological and preliminary clinical results of this cohort were satisfactory.

机械臂辅助髋臼重建翻修全髋关节置换术:一项至少两年随访的临床研究。
目的:本研究旨在报道机械臂辅助髋臼重建在翻修型全髋关节置换术(THA)中的手术技术和早期临床结果。方法:2019年10月至2021年5月,我们使用Mako机器人系统在我院进行了62例tha翻修手术。本研究包括54例接受机械臂辅助翻修THA进行髋臼重建的患者。本文报道了使用机器人系统重建髋臼的手术技术,包括术前计划、术中定位和不同定位方法的准确性。评估目标髋臼组件定位与最终定位之间的准确性。分析最新随访Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和x线片。结果:纳入的54例髋关节,共开发了4种不同表面的术中配准方法,共配准65次。注册过程的总体成功率为98.5%。成功配准的平均精度为0.38 mm(0.2 ~ 0.5)。Mako评估的目标和最终髋臼组件方向的中位差为倾斜1.0°(-2.0°至0.0°),前倾0.0°(-1.0°至1.0°)。4个髋被归类为髋臼部件定位的异常值。术后x线片上重建的旋转中心(CORs)比解剖CORs平均低4.72 mm (SD 4.71),横向偏移3.92 mm (SD 4.62)。中位HHS由术前46.0 (IQR 33.0 ~ 58.3)改善至术后89.0 (IQR 78.3 ~ 93.0),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。总体满意度为86.0% (n = 50)。在最近的随访中没有放射学失败。结论:机械臂辅助翻修THA为骨缺损分析提供了有价值的信息,可指导骨缺损的重建策略。机械臂辅助扩孔和髋臼组件或增强定位有助于准确的组件位置和方向。该队列的放射学和初步临床结果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信