Development of Quantitative Instrumentation for Cone of Economy Analysis: Bridging Radiographic and Clinical Measures.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hsu Ming Chang, Soong Christina, Yeh Ting Jen, Chen Hsuan Yu
{"title":"Development of Quantitative Instrumentation for Cone of Economy Analysis: Bridging Radiographic and Clinical Measures.","authors":"Hsu Ming Chang, Soong Christina, Yeh Ting Jen, Chen Hsuan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Postural misalignment and compromised balance are major contributors to fall risk in the elderly, leading to significant physical injuries, reduced quality of life (QOL), and increased healthcare burdens. Evaluating postural stability is critical for fall prevention. The cone of economy (CoE) concept explores the range of motion of the center of mass and head required to maintain a stable upright posture, yet its measurement remains challenging due to the limitations of existing methods.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study introduces a novel apparatus for real-time measurement of both external and internal CoEs, offering a cost-effective alternative to expensive and complex traditional methods that require extensive data processing.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>The study employed a controlled experimental design to develop and validate the proposed CoE measurement apparatus in a laboratory setting using a sample of healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed apparatus used two spherical measuring units to independently track pelvic and T1 vertebra motion, employing dual rotational magnetic encoders and a linear displacement sensor for precise 3D motion contour capture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation experiments confirmed the system's reliability, achieving an average measurement error below 1.5 mm. The CoE is not an idealized cone but has an irregular conical shape, influenced by physiological factors (height and weight). The average range of sway (RoS) for external CoE at T1 was 42.7 (coronal), 47.6 (sagittal), and 12.5 cm (vertical), whereas that at the pelvic position was 14.3, 13.4, and 8 cm, respectively. The average RoS for internal CoE were smaller: 10.4 (coronal), 6.9 (sagittal), and 2 cm (vertical) at T1 and 8.2, 5.8, and 2.2 cm, respectively, at the pelvic position. The external CoE exhibited a larger RoS at the body's front, reflecting the foot's role in balancing forward shifts of gravity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary findings highlight a stronger correlation between external CoE and height than internal CoE, establishing a foundation for CoE research with implications for fall prevention and balance assessment.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study introduces a reliable, cost-effective apparatus for real-time cone of economy (CoE) measurement, offering dynamic insights into postural stability, fall risk, and personalized balance assessment in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Postural misalignment and compromised balance are major contributors to fall risk in the elderly, leading to significant physical injuries, reduced quality of life (QOL), and increased healthcare burdens. Evaluating postural stability is critical for fall prevention. The cone of economy (CoE) concept explores the range of motion of the center of mass and head required to maintain a stable upright posture, yet its measurement remains challenging due to the limitations of existing methods.

Purpose: This study introduces a novel apparatus for real-time measurement of both external and internal CoEs, offering a cost-effective alternative to expensive and complex traditional methods that require extensive data processing.

Study design/setting: The study employed a controlled experimental design to develop and validate the proposed CoE measurement apparatus in a laboratory setting using a sample of healthy young adults.

Methods: The proposed apparatus used two spherical measuring units to independently track pelvic and T1 vertebra motion, employing dual rotational magnetic encoders and a linear displacement sensor for precise 3D motion contour capture.

Results: Validation experiments confirmed the system's reliability, achieving an average measurement error below 1.5 mm. The CoE is not an idealized cone but has an irregular conical shape, influenced by physiological factors (height and weight). The average range of sway (RoS) for external CoE at T1 was 42.7 (coronal), 47.6 (sagittal), and 12.5 cm (vertical), whereas that at the pelvic position was 14.3, 13.4, and 8 cm, respectively. The average RoS for internal CoE were smaller: 10.4 (coronal), 6.9 (sagittal), and 2 cm (vertical) at T1 and 8.2, 5.8, and 2.2 cm, respectively, at the pelvic position. The external CoE exhibited a larger RoS at the body's front, reflecting the foot's role in balancing forward shifts of gravity.

Conclusions: Preliminary findings highlight a stronger correlation between external CoE and height than internal CoE, establishing a foundation for CoE research with implications for fall prevention and balance assessment.

Clinical significance: This study introduces a reliable, cost-effective apparatus for real-time cone of economy (CoE) measurement, offering dynamic insights into postural stability, fall risk, and personalized balance assessment in clinical settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信