Comparative analysis of U-Mamba and no new U-Net for the detection and segmentation of esophageal cancer in contrast-enhanced computed tomography images.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1116
Yifan Hu, Yi Zhang, Zeyu Tang, Xin Han, Huimin Hong, Lin Kong, Zhihan Xu, Shanshan Jiang, Xiaojin Yu, Lei Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of U-Mamba and no new U-Net for the detection and segmentation of esophageal cancer in contrast-enhanced computed tomography images.","authors":"Yifan Hu, Yi Zhang, Zeyu Tang, Xin Han, Huimin Hong, Lin Kong, Zhihan Xu, Shanshan Jiang, Xiaojin Yu, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiomics research in esophageal cancer (EC) has made considerable advancements. However, manual segmentation, which is relied upon in clinical and scientific workflows, remains time-consuming and inconsistent. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for the automatic detection and segmentation of EC lesions in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected the CT data of patients with EC confirmed by pathology from January 2017 to September 2021 at three hospitals and from individuals with a healthy esophagus. Manual labeling of EC lesions was conducted, and DL networks [no new U-Net (nnU-Net) and U-Mamba] were trained for automatic segmentation. An optimal threshold volume for EC lesion detection was determined and integrated into the postprocessing module. The performance of DL models was evaluated in internal, external, and thin-slice image test cohorts and compared with diagnoses by radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 871 patients (564 males) were included, with a median age of 67 years. DL models exhibited no significant difference from radiologists' diagnoses (P>0.05). Median DSC values for the internal, external, and thin-slice cohorts were 0.795, 0.811, and 0.797, respectively, with a corresponding HD of 9.733 mm, 7.860 mm, and 8.168 mm. An intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 was observed for 97.2% of the radiomic features extracted from thin-slice images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL methods demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and robustness in EC detection and segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT images, not only reducing missed EC diagnoses but also providing radiologists with consistent lesion annotations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"2119-2131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiomics research in esophageal cancer (EC) has made considerable advancements. However, manual segmentation, which is relied upon in clinical and scientific workflows, remains time-consuming and inconsistent. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for the automatic detection and segmentation of EC lesions in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the CT data of patients with EC confirmed by pathology from January 2017 to September 2021 at three hospitals and from individuals with a healthy esophagus. Manual labeling of EC lesions was conducted, and DL networks [no new U-Net (nnU-Net) and U-Mamba] were trained for automatic segmentation. An optimal threshold volume for EC lesion detection was determined and integrated into the postprocessing module. The performance of DL models was evaluated in internal, external, and thin-slice image test cohorts and compared with diagnoses by radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated.

Results: A total of 871 patients (564 males) were included, with a median age of 67 years. DL models exhibited no significant difference from radiologists' diagnoses (P>0.05). Median DSC values for the internal, external, and thin-slice cohorts were 0.795, 0.811, and 0.797, respectively, with a corresponding HD of 9.733 mm, 7.860 mm, and 8.168 mm. An intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 was observed for 97.2% of the radiomic features extracted from thin-slice images.

Conclusions: The DL methods demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and robustness in EC detection and segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT images, not only reducing missed EC diagnoses but also providing radiologists with consistent lesion annotations.

U-Mamba与无新U-Net在食管癌ct增强图像检测与分割中的对比分析。
背景:食管癌放射组学研究已取得长足进展。然而,在临床和科学工作流程中依赖的人工分割仍然耗时且不一致。本研究旨在开发和验证一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中EC病变的自动检测和分割。方法:回顾性收集2017年1月至2021年9月三家医院经病理证实的EC患者和食管健康个体的CT资料。对EC病变进行人工标记,并训练DL网络[no new U-Net (nnU-Net)和U-Mamba]进行自动分割。确定最佳阈值体积,并将其集成到后处理模块中。在内部、外部和薄层图像测试队列中评估DL模型的性能,并与放射科医生的诊断进行比较。计算灵敏度、特异度、准确度、Dice相似系数(DSC)和Hausdorff距离(HD)。结果:共纳入871例患者,其中男性564例,中位年龄67岁。DL模型与放射科医师的诊断无显著差异(P < 0.05)。内部、外部和薄层队列的DSC中位数分别为0.795、0.811和0.797,相应的HD为9.733 mm、7.860 mm和8.168 mm。从薄层图像中提取的放射学特征中,97.2%的类内相关系数大于0.7。结论:DL方法在对比增强CT图像的EC检测和分割中表现出卓越的敏感性和鲁棒性,不仅减少了EC的漏诊,而且为放射科医生提供了一致的病变注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信