Evaluation of Dental Students' Performance in Periodontology Course According to Their Learning Styles.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Özlem Saraç Atagün, Seval Ceylan Şen, Gülbahar Ustaoğlu, Hülya Toker
{"title":"Evaluation of Dental Students' Performance in Periodontology Course According to Their Learning Styles.","authors":"Özlem Saraç Atagün, Seval Ceylan Şen, Gülbahar Ustaoğlu, Hülya Toker","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>This study was designed to distinguish learning styles among dental students and correlate them with their academic performance in periodontology courses by using the Grasha-Riechmann Learning Style Scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eleven third-year dental students (72 female and 39 male) in the academic year 2023-2024 from Health Sciences University Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry in Ankara, Turkey, were participating. Grasha-Riechmann Learning Style Scale, which consists of 60 questions and evaluates learning styles in six subcategories, was applied to the students. All students who agreed to participate in the study answered the questionnaire at a rate of 100%. While theoretical performance was evaluated with a final exam at the end of the year, students were asked to remove dental calculus on a model in the preclinical laboratory to measure practical performance. The study used descriptive statistics and checked for normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-normal data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, while Spearman correlations examined relationships between continuous variables. For categorical variables, Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test was applied, with all analyses conducted in SPSS 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dependent learning style was found to be the dominant style among the students. The lowest mean total score was obtained for the competitive learning style. No relationship was found between students' learning styles and their gender, periodontology practical, or theoretical grade point averages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental students exhibit different learning styles, but these styles do not impact their practical or theoretical success in the periodontology course. Further research with larger samples is needed to explore the influence of learning styles on their education in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: This study was designed to distinguish learning styles among dental students and correlate them with their academic performance in periodontology courses by using the Grasha-Riechmann Learning Style Scale.

Methods: One hundred eleven third-year dental students (72 female and 39 male) in the academic year 2023-2024 from Health Sciences University Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry in Ankara, Turkey, were participating. Grasha-Riechmann Learning Style Scale, which consists of 60 questions and evaluates learning styles in six subcategories, was applied to the students. All students who agreed to participate in the study answered the questionnaire at a rate of 100%. While theoretical performance was evaluated with a final exam at the end of the year, students were asked to remove dental calculus on a model in the preclinical laboratory to measure practical performance. The study used descriptive statistics and checked for normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-normal data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, while Spearman correlations examined relationships between continuous variables. For categorical variables, Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test was applied, with all analyses conducted in SPSS 25.

Results: Dependent learning style was found to be the dominant style among the students. The lowest mean total score was obtained for the competitive learning style. No relationship was found between students' learning styles and their gender, periodontology practical, or theoretical grade point averages.

Conclusions: Dental students exhibit different learning styles, but these styles do not impact their practical or theoretical success in the periodontology course. Further research with larger samples is needed to explore the influence of learning styles on their education in this area.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信