Fueling Inner Resources Through Co-Creation: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Co-Creation of Education on Learners' Well-Being.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1726
Shireen Suliman, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Abdel Hakim Bishawi, Margaret Allen, Karen D Könings
{"title":"Fueling Inner Resources Through Co-Creation: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Co-Creation of Education on Learners' Well-Being.","authors":"Shireen Suliman, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Abdel Hakim Bishawi, Margaret Allen, Karen D Könings","doi":"10.5334/pme.1726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Co-creation is gaining momentum in health professions education with positive effects on learners' engagement and motivation. Concurrently, emotional challenges faced by learners-such as stress, anxiety, burnout, and depression-continue to be a problem for health professions education leaders. This review seeks to explore how learners' active participation in shaping their educational experience may influence their well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINHAL. We included studies conducted within a health professions education context, which involved learners in curriculum design processes, and reported outcomes related to learners' well-being. We used Seligman's PERMA model to report these terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4222 reviewed articles, 24 met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported outcomes related to learners' well-being across the five domains of the PERMA model: Positive Emotions (n = 23), Meaning (n = 20), Positive Relationships (n = 10), Engagement (n = 4), and Accomplishment (n = 4). Studies describing a true student-staff partnership approach (n = 17) involved smaller learner groups, focused on developing new curricula reported outcomes related to learners' positive well-being in all five domains. Studies describing pseudo-partnership (N = 7) also reported positive learner well-being, but not in all domains, and mostly focused in the context of developing extracurricular mental health initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-creation, especially when true student-staff partnership is used, can have a positive influence on learners' well-being. This underscores the importance of empowering learners to participate in shaping their education. Lessons learned from this review may encourage curriculum planners and education leaders to create opportunities and initiatives for involving learners in the design of their education.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"129-140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1726","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Co-creation is gaining momentum in health professions education with positive effects on learners' engagement and motivation. Concurrently, emotional challenges faced by learners-such as stress, anxiety, burnout, and depression-continue to be a problem for health professions education leaders. This review seeks to explore how learners' active participation in shaping their educational experience may influence their well-being.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINHAL. We included studies conducted within a health professions education context, which involved learners in curriculum design processes, and reported outcomes related to learners' well-being. We used Seligman's PERMA model to report these terms.

Results: Of 4222 reviewed articles, 24 met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported outcomes related to learners' well-being across the five domains of the PERMA model: Positive Emotions (n = 23), Meaning (n = 20), Positive Relationships (n = 10), Engagement (n = 4), and Accomplishment (n = 4). Studies describing a true student-staff partnership approach (n = 17) involved smaller learner groups, focused on developing new curricula reported outcomes related to learners' positive well-being in all five domains. Studies describing pseudo-partnership (N = 7) also reported positive learner well-being, but not in all domains, and mostly focused in the context of developing extracurricular mental health initiatives.

Conclusions: Co-creation, especially when true student-staff partnership is used, can have a positive influence on learners' well-being. This underscores the importance of empowering learners to participate in shaping their education. Lessons learned from this review may encourage curriculum planners and education leaders to create opportunities and initiatives for involving learners in the design of their education.

引言共同创造在卫生专业教育中的发展势头日益强劲,对学习者的参与度和积极性产生了积极影响。与此同时,学习者面临的情感挑战--如压力、焦虑、职业倦怠和抑郁--仍然是卫生专业教育领导者面临的一个问题。本综述旨在探讨学习者积极参与塑造他们的教育体验会如何影响他们的幸福感:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CINHAL。我们纳入了在卫生专业教育背景下进行的研究,这些研究让学习者参与课程设计过程,并报告了与学习者幸福感相关的结果。我们使用 Seligman 的 PERMA 模型来报告这些术语:在 4222 篇经审核的文章中,有 24 篇符合纳入标准。所有研究都报告了 PERMA 模型五个领域中与学习者幸福感相关的结果:积极情绪(n = 23)、意义(n = 20)、积极关系(n = 10)、参与(n = 4)和成就(n = 4)。描述真正的学生-教职员工伙伴关系方法的研究(n = 17)涉及较小的学习者群体,侧重于开发新的课程,报告了与学习者在所有五个领域的积极幸福相关的成果。关于伪伙伴关系的研究(N = 7)也报告了学习者的积极幸福感,但不是在所有领域,而且大多侧重于开发课外心理健康活动:结论:共同创造,特别是当学生与教职员工建立真正的伙伴关系时,可以对学习者的幸福感产生积极影响。这强调了让学习者有能力参与塑造其教育的重要性。从本综述中汲取的经验教训可鼓励课程规划者和教育领导者创造机会和采取举措,让学习者参与其教育设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信