Flow characteristics of reperfusion sheaths when utilizing large bore mechanical circulatory support devices.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Imran Naeem Aziz, Ahmad Jabri, Ying Xu, Seth Bilazarian, Dana Bentley, Amir Kaki, Allison Dupont, William O'Neill, Herbert D Aronow, Alejandro Lemor, Hady Lichaa, Alexander G Truesdell, Mir B Basir
{"title":"Flow characteristics of reperfusion sheaths when utilizing large bore mechanical circulatory support devices.","authors":"Imran Naeem Aziz, Ahmad Jabri, Ying Xu, Seth Bilazarian, Dana Bentley, Amir Kaki, Allison Dupont, William O'Neill, Herbert D Aronow, Alejandro Lemor, Hady Lichaa, Alexander G Truesdell, Mir B Basir","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reperfusion sheaths are commonly utilized to prevent acute limb ischemia (ALI) when using large bore mechanical circulatory support devices, though little is known about flow characteristics of these sheaths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this assessment was to characterize the flow rates of various femoral to femoral (fem-fem) bypass circuits. We devised a test setup that maintains a preset input pressure for test devices to enable an accurate comparison of bypass techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negligible flow rate increases were observed in active or passive ipsilateral and contralateral circuits when donor or receiver sheaths were sequentially increased in size. When using a contralateral fem-fem bypass circuit, the use of a Merit Prelude Pro 8F sheath paired with a 5F Arrow reperfusion sheath provided 167 ml/min of flow. If the reperfusion sheath was exchanged to a 6F sheath the flow rate was 169 ml/min, 175 ml/min with a 7F sheath and 179 ml/min with an 8F sheath, a total difference of 7 %. When maintaining a 6F reperfusion sheath as a constant, the use an ipsilateral fem-fem bypass circuit using an Abiomed 14F Low profile sheath provided 215 ml/min of flow, a 27 % higher flow than a contralateral 8F circuit. The use of an active pressure bypass system using an 18F ECMO cannula provided 356 ml/min, a 66 % higher flow than a 14F ipsilateral fem-fem bypass and 110 % higher flow than an 8F contralateral fem-fem bypass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flow rate through a fem-fem bypass circuit is contingent upon the smallest diameter along the pathway which is typically the side port of the sheath. There are negligible changes in flow rate based on increasing donor or receiver sheath sizes. Novel, purpose-built reperfusion sheath taking these flow characteristics into account are needed to improve such systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reperfusion sheaths are commonly utilized to prevent acute limb ischemia (ALI) when using large bore mechanical circulatory support devices, though little is known about flow characteristics of these sheaths.

Methods: The purpose of this assessment was to characterize the flow rates of various femoral to femoral (fem-fem) bypass circuits. We devised a test setup that maintains a preset input pressure for test devices to enable an accurate comparison of bypass techniques.

Results: Negligible flow rate increases were observed in active or passive ipsilateral and contralateral circuits when donor or receiver sheaths were sequentially increased in size. When using a contralateral fem-fem bypass circuit, the use of a Merit Prelude Pro 8F sheath paired with a 5F Arrow reperfusion sheath provided 167 ml/min of flow. If the reperfusion sheath was exchanged to a 6F sheath the flow rate was 169 ml/min, 175 ml/min with a 7F sheath and 179 ml/min with an 8F sheath, a total difference of 7 %. When maintaining a 6F reperfusion sheath as a constant, the use an ipsilateral fem-fem bypass circuit using an Abiomed 14F Low profile sheath provided 215 ml/min of flow, a 27 % higher flow than a contralateral 8F circuit. The use of an active pressure bypass system using an 18F ECMO cannula provided 356 ml/min, a 66 % higher flow than a 14F ipsilateral fem-fem bypass and 110 % higher flow than an 8F contralateral fem-fem bypass.

Conclusion: Flow rate through a fem-fem bypass circuit is contingent upon the smallest diameter along the pathway which is typically the side port of the sheath. There are negligible changes in flow rate based on increasing donor or receiver sheath sizes. Novel, purpose-built reperfusion sheath taking these flow characteristics into account are needed to improve such systems.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信