Changes in heart failure healthcare in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0138
Raphael Rothenberger, Thomas Blakeman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Faye Forsyth, Muhammad Hossain, Emma Sowden, Christi Deaton
{"title":"Changes in heart failure healthcare in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Raphael Rothenberger, Thomas Blakeman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Faye Forsyth, Muhammad Hossain, Emma Sowden, Christi Deaton","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote healthcare for long-term condition management, including heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the experiences of this transition, knowledge developed during service transformation, and/or the preferences of clinicians and HF patients going forward.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the perspectives and consensus of healthcare providers, patients, and carers in the UK regarding the transition to remote HF healthcare during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A survey was conducted among individuals with HF and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An evaluation of stakeholders' views and a consensus-development exercise regarding the utilisation of telehealth and home monitoring devices were conducted using a modified Delphi process on an online platform. This study primarily included patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed a significant reliance on telehealth, which reportedly enhanced accessibility for patients. Integration of home monitoring devices and systems was deemed crucial for care continuity. Although there was some consensus concerning the usefulness of remote consultations and communication, findings also highlighted their limitations and disparities in digital access and literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote healthcare presents opportunities and risks, emphasising the need for equitable access to telehealth technologies and thoughtful integration into healthcare systems. Balancing remote and in-person care, along with targeted training for healthcare providers, is essential for effective management and support of people with long-term conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote healthcare for long-term condition management, including heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the experiences of this transition, knowledge developed during service transformation, and/or the preferences of clinicians and HF patients going forward.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the perspectives and consensus of healthcare providers, patients, and carers in the UK regarding the transition to remote HF healthcare during the pandemic.

Design & setting: A survey was conducted among individuals with HF and healthcare providers.

Method: An evaluation of stakeholders' views and a consensus-development exercise regarding the utilisation of telehealth and home monitoring devices were conducted using a modified Delphi process on an online platform. This study primarily included patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Results: Findings revealed a significant reliance on telehealth, which reportedly enhanced accessibility for patients. Integration of home monitoring devices and systems was deemed crucial for care continuity. Although there was some consensus concerning the usefulness of remote consultations and communication, findings also highlighted their limitations and disparities in digital access and literacy.

Conclusion: Remote healthcare presents opportunities and risks, emphasising the need for equitable access to telehealth technologies and thoughtful integration into healthcare systems. Balancing remote and in-person care, along with targeted training for healthcare providers, is essential for effective management and support of people with long-term conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信