Effectiveness of Massage Gun Versus Myofascial Release Technique for Releasing Latent Trigger Points of the Calf Muscle: A Protocol for Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.8 Q3 REHABILITATION
Md Mafrohi Sattar, Abid Hasan Khan, Md Feroz Kabir, K M Amran Hossain, Sharmila Jahan, Ehsanur Rahman, Farzana Sharmin, Md Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan, Azharul Islam, Md Kabir Hossain, Md Zahid Hossain
{"title":"Effectiveness of Massage Gun Versus Myofascial Release Technique for Releasing Latent Trigger Points of the Calf Muscle: A Protocol for Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Md Mafrohi Sattar, Abid Hasan Khan, Md Feroz Kabir, K M Amran Hossain, Sharmila Jahan, Ehsanur Rahman, Farzana Sharmin, Md Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan, Azharul Islam, Md Kabir Hossain, Md Zahid Hossain","doi":"10.1002/pri.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Trigger points can disrupt muscle activity patterns and cause cramping, fatigue, and weakening. Massage guns and myofascial release are widely employed for such circumstances, but their isolated outcomes are unknown. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a massage gun versus myofascial release technique on subjective pain, pain pressure threshold and ankle ROM for 12 weeks in people with pain and latent trigger points in the calf muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2024 to November 2025, this assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial will enroll 60 patients with latent myofascial trigger points in the calf and equally (1:1) allocate them randomly to either massage gun (Group A) or myofascial release technique (Group B) at the Outpatient Service Unit, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology (JUST), Jashore, Bangladesh. Both groups will receive 12 sessions of massage gun or myofascial release on latent trigger points, with 20 min of ice once a week for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes are subjective pain severity by the visual analog scale and pain sensitivity by pressure algometry, while the secondary outcome is ankle dorsiflexion range of motion by an inclinometer to be measured at the baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. The ethical approval and trial registration obtained prospectively, we will adhere to the International committee on harmonization good clinical practice (ICH-GCP) by confirming confidentiality, respect, voluntary participation and withdrawal rights of participants and justice. To ensure trial safety, the manageable and fatal adverse effects will be recorded and reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sociodemographic, clinical, and outcome characteristics will be collected at baseline after randomization. A non-experimental assessor will evaluate group treatments afterward. A data monitoring committee-appointed expert data analyst will compare and analyze the independent assessors' baseline and post-treatment outcome values.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will address the research gap on isolated outcomes of newly addressed widely used massage guns and conventional myofascial release techniques on reducing subjective pain, and pressure pain threshold and improving ankle ROM for patients with pain and latent trigger points at the calf muscle. This single-centre study will indicate short-term outcomes with poor external generalization, but the study will help the clinicians in evidence-based practice and guide future multicenter studies with long term evaluations with a follow-up design.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) (XXXXXXXXXXX) (Prospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 2","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Trigger points can disrupt muscle activity patterns and cause cramping, fatigue, and weakening. Massage guns and myofascial release are widely employed for such circumstances, but their isolated outcomes are unknown. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a massage gun versus myofascial release technique on subjective pain, pain pressure threshold and ankle ROM for 12 weeks in people with pain and latent trigger points in the calf muscles.

Methods: From December 2024 to November 2025, this assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial will enroll 60 patients with latent myofascial trigger points in the calf and equally (1:1) allocate them randomly to either massage gun (Group A) or myofascial release technique (Group B) at the Outpatient Service Unit, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology (JUST), Jashore, Bangladesh. Both groups will receive 12 sessions of massage gun or myofascial release on latent trigger points, with 20 min of ice once a week for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes are subjective pain severity by the visual analog scale and pain sensitivity by pressure algometry, while the secondary outcome is ankle dorsiflexion range of motion by an inclinometer to be measured at the baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. The ethical approval and trial registration obtained prospectively, we will adhere to the International committee on harmonization good clinical practice (ICH-GCP) by confirming confidentiality, respect, voluntary participation and withdrawal rights of participants and justice. To ensure trial safety, the manageable and fatal adverse effects will be recorded and reported.

Results: Sociodemographic, clinical, and outcome characteristics will be collected at baseline after randomization. A non-experimental assessor will evaluate group treatments afterward. A data monitoring committee-appointed expert data analyst will compare and analyze the independent assessors' baseline and post-treatment outcome values.

Discussion: This study will address the research gap on isolated outcomes of newly addressed widely used massage guns and conventional myofascial release techniques on reducing subjective pain, and pressure pain threshold and improving ankle ROM for patients with pain and latent trigger points at the calf muscle. This single-centre study will indicate short-term outcomes with poor external generalization, but the study will help the clinicians in evidence-based practice and guide future multicenter studies with long term evaluations with a follow-up design.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) (XXXXXXXXXXX) (Prospectively registered).

按摩枪与肌筋膜释放技术对释放小腿肌肉潜在触发点的有效性:一项随机临床试验方案。
背景和目的:触发点会破坏肌肉活动模式,导致抽筋、疲劳和虚弱。按摩枪和肌筋膜松解被广泛用于这种情况,但其孤立的结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较按摩枪与肌筋膜释放技术对小腿肌肉疼痛和潜在触发点患者主观疼痛、痛压阈值和踝关节ROM的有效性,为期12周。方法:从2024年12月至2025年11月,该评估盲随机临床试验将招募60名小腿潜伏肌筋膜触发点患者,并将其平均(1:1)随机分配到按摩枪(A组)或肌筋膜释放技术(B组)门诊服务单元,j岸上科技大学(JUST), j岸上,孟加拉国。两组都将接受12次按摩枪或肌筋膜释放潜在触发点,每周一次20分钟冰敷,持续12周。主要结果是通过视觉模拟量表测量主观疼痛严重程度和通过压力测量测量疼痛敏感性,而次要结果是在基线和治疗后12周通过倾斜仪测量踝关节背屈活动范围。前瞻性获得的伦理审批和试验注册,我们将遵循国际协调良好临床规范委员会(ICH-GCP),确认受试者的保密、尊重、自愿参与和退出权以及公正。为确保试验安全,可控制和致命的不良反应将被记录和报告。结果:随机分组后,将收集基线时的社会人口学、临床和结局特征。一名非实验评估员将在之后评估小组治疗。数据监测委员会指定的专家数据分析师将比较和分析独立评估者的基线值和治疗后结果值。讨论:本研究将填补新近广泛使用的按摩枪和传统肌筋膜释放技术在减轻小腿肌肉疼痛和潜在触发点患者主观疼痛、压力痛阈和改善踝关节活动度方面的孤立结果的研究空白。该单中心研究将显示短期结果,但外部通用性较差,但该研究将帮助临床医生进行循证实践,并指导未来的多中心研究,通过随访设计进行长期评估。试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI) (XXXXXXXXXXX)(前瞻性注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信