The role of the municipal welfare domain in palliative care: exploring the views of coordinators of Dutch regional palliative care networks.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251326188
Trudy Schutter, Ian Koper, Kris Vissers, Jeroen Hasselaar
{"title":"The role of the municipal welfare domain in palliative care: exploring the views of coordinators of Dutch regional palliative care networks.","authors":"Trudy Schutter, Ian Koper, Kris Vissers, Jeroen Hasselaar","doi":"10.1177/26323524251326188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration between the healthcare domain and welfare domain could benefit people confronted with an incurable disease residing at home and their informal caregivers, but little is known about this collaboration regarding palliative care. There are regional palliative care networks in the Netherlands, supporting interdisciplinary integrated palliative care; each network has a network coordinator who is a primary liaison for the network and who has an overview of palliative care services and activities in the region. However, the view of the networks on the role of the welfare domain and collaboration with the welfare domain in the field of palliative care is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to explore the awareness of professionals for the social dimension of palliative care and to explore how collaboration between the healthcare domain and the Dutch municipal welfare domain, in the field of palliative care, can be improved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Focus group research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, six focus groups and two individual interviews were held with 30 coordinators of regional palliative care networks in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study showed that coordinators of regional palliative care networks consider collaboration with the welfare domain to be important. There are major differences between the regional palliative care networks regarding knowledge about and collaboration with the welfare domain. Coordinators themselves can function as catalysts for collaboration between palliative care and the welfare domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the Netherlands, collaboration between the welfare domain and the healthcare domain in the field of palliative care is limited and differs considerably between regions. The Dutch municipal welfare domain is relevant for a large group of people confronted with an incurable disease, but it does not provide them with tailored services. Collaboration between palliative care and the municipal welfare domain has great potential, both on the patient level and on the level of the sustainability of palliative care, but it currently seems underexplored.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251326188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251326188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between the healthcare domain and welfare domain could benefit people confronted with an incurable disease residing at home and their informal caregivers, but little is known about this collaboration regarding palliative care. There are regional palliative care networks in the Netherlands, supporting interdisciplinary integrated palliative care; each network has a network coordinator who is a primary liaison for the network and who has an overview of palliative care services and activities in the region. However, the view of the networks on the role of the welfare domain and collaboration with the welfare domain in the field of palliative care is unknown.

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the awareness of professionals for the social dimension of palliative care and to explore how collaboration between the healthcare domain and the Dutch municipal welfare domain, in the field of palliative care, can be improved.

Design: Focus group research.

Methods: In 2022, six focus groups and two individual interviews were held with 30 coordinators of regional palliative care networks in the Netherlands.

Results: This study showed that coordinators of regional palliative care networks consider collaboration with the welfare domain to be important. There are major differences between the regional palliative care networks regarding knowledge about and collaboration with the welfare domain. Coordinators themselves can function as catalysts for collaboration between palliative care and the welfare domain.

Conclusion: In the Netherlands, collaboration between the welfare domain and the healthcare domain in the field of palliative care is limited and differs considerably between regions. The Dutch municipal welfare domain is relevant for a large group of people confronted with an incurable disease, but it does not provide them with tailored services. Collaboration between palliative care and the municipal welfare domain has great potential, both on the patient level and on the level of the sustainability of palliative care, but it currently seems underexplored.

市政福利领域在姑息治疗中的作用:探索荷兰区域姑息治疗网络协调员的观点。
背景:医疗保健领域和福利领域之间的合作可以使居住在家中的不治之症患者及其非正式护理人员受益,但对这种关于姑息治疗的合作知之甚少。荷兰有区域姑息治疗网络,支持跨学科综合姑息治疗;每个网络都有一名网络协调员,他是网络的主要联络人,并对该地区的姑息治疗服务和活动进行概述。然而,网络对福利领域的作用和与福利领域在姑息治疗领域的合作的看法是未知的。目的:本研究的目的是探讨专业人员对姑息治疗的社会维度的认识,并探讨如何在姑息治疗领域改善医疗保健领域和荷兰市政福利领域之间的合作。设计:焦点小组研究。方法:在2022年,对荷兰30名区域姑息治疗网络协调员进行了6个焦点小组和2次个人访谈。结果:本研究表明,区域姑息治疗网络的协调员认为与福利领域的合作是重要的。关于福利领域的知识和合作,区域姑息治疗网络之间存在重大差异。协调员本身可以作为缓和医疗和福利领域之间合作的催化剂。结论:在荷兰,福利领域和医疗保健领域在姑息治疗领域的合作是有限的,不同地区之间的差异很大。荷兰市政福利领域与一大群面临不治之症的人有关,但它没有为他们提供量身定制的服务。姑息治疗和市政福利领域之间的合作具有巨大的潜力,无论是在患者层面还是在姑息治疗的可持续性层面,但目前似乎尚未得到充分探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信