Exploring Caregiver Support as a Potential Mediator of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Reduced Likelihood of Liver Transplant Waitlisting.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001782
Anna M Morenz, Jordan Nichols, Andrew Snyder, James Perkins, David K Prince, Omri Ganzarski, Zakariya Hussein, Nicole J Kim, Andre Dick, Yue-Harn Ng
{"title":"Exploring Caregiver Support as a Potential Mediator of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Reduced Likelihood of Liver Transplant Waitlisting.","authors":"Anna M Morenz, Jordan Nichols, Andrew Snyder, James Perkins, David K Prince, Omri Ganzarski, Zakariya Hussein, Nicole J Kim, Andre Dick, Yue-Harn Ng","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods may be at risk of inequitable access to the liver transplant (LT) waitlisting (WL), but mechanisms mediating this relationship are not well understood. We assessed whether area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, was associated with LT WL and assessed whether caregiver support, a potentially modifiable factor, mediated this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults referred for LT evaluation from January 2015 to December 2021. First, we assessed the association between ADI and LT WL using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Second, we analyzed caregiver support as a potential mediator through mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2574 patients were referred for LT, 2057 patients initiated evaluation, and 622 patients were waitlisted. Residence in the highest ADI quartile was associated with lower probability of WL (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.99) after adjusting for individual medical and sociodemographic factors, and distance from the transplant center. In adjusted mediation analysis, caregiver support did not mediate the relationship between ADI and LT WL (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01), and highest ADI quartile also did not have significant direct effects on LT WL (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72-1.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADI may be useful as a screening tool to identify candidates who could benefit from early intervention in the LT process when individual social needs information is not available. Caregiver support did not mediate the ADI and LT WL association. Additional work is needed to understand which modifiable factors may mediate this association to inform potential interventions for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 4","pages":"e1782"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods may be at risk of inequitable access to the liver transplant (LT) waitlisting (WL), but mechanisms mediating this relationship are not well understood. We assessed whether area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, was associated with LT WL and assessed whether caregiver support, a potentially modifiable factor, mediated this relationship.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults referred for LT evaluation from January 2015 to December 2021. First, we assessed the association between ADI and LT WL using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Second, we analyzed caregiver support as a potential mediator through mediation analysis.

Results: During the study period, 2574 patients were referred for LT, 2057 patients initiated evaluation, and 622 patients were waitlisted. Residence in the highest ADI quartile was associated with lower probability of WL (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.99) after adjusting for individual medical and sociodemographic factors, and distance from the transplant center. In adjusted mediation analysis, caregiver support did not mediate the relationship between ADI and LT WL (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01), and highest ADI quartile also did not have significant direct effects on LT WL (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72-1.26).

Conclusions: ADI may be useful as a screening tool to identify candidates who could benefit from early intervention in the LT process when individual social needs information is not available. Caregiver support did not mediate the ADI and LT WL association. Additional work is needed to understand which modifiable factors may mediate this association to inform potential interventions for this population.

探讨照顾者支持作为社区社会经济劣势和降低肝移植候补可能性的潜在中介。
背景:来自社会经济弱势社区的个体可能面临不公平获得肝移植(LT)等待名单(WL)的风险,但介导这种关系的机制尚不清楚。我们评估了区域剥夺指数(ADI),一个衡量社区社会经济剥夺的指标,是否与低死亡率相关,并评估了护理者支持,一个潜在的可改变因素,是否介导了这种关系。方法:我们在2015年1月至2021年12月期间对成人进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。首先,我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估了ADI和LT - WL之间的关系。其次,我们通过中介分析分析了照顾者支持作为潜在的中介。结果:在研究期间,2574例患者被转诊为LT, 2057例患者开始评估,622例患者被列入等待名单。居住在ADI最高的四分位数与WL的概率较低相关(比值比[OR], 0.72;95%置信区间[CI], 0.52-0.99),调整了个人医疗和社会人口因素,以及与移植中心的距离。在调整后的中介分析中,照顾者支持没有调节ADI与LT WL之间的关系(OR, 0.90;95% CI, 0.80-1.01),最高ADI四分位数对LT WL也没有显著的直接影响(OR, 0.95;95% ci, 0.72-1.26)。结论:当个体社会需求信息无法获得时,ADI可能是一种有用的筛选工具,可以确定哪些候选人可以从LT过程的早期干预中受益。照顾者的支持并没有调节ADI和LT - WL之间的关系。需要进一步的工作来了解哪些可改变的因素可能介导这种关联,从而为这一人群提供潜在的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信