Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000290
Malgorzata Maciaszek, Brendan Steinfort, Timothy Harrington, Ken Faulder, Nazih Assaad, Mark Dexter, Alice Ma
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma.","authors":"Malgorzata Maciaszek, Brendan Steinfort, Timothy Harrington, Ken Faulder, Nazih Assaad, Mark Dexter, Alice Ma","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess recurrence rates, procedural outcomes and patient outcomes following middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two tertiary neurosurgical referral centers in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>13 adult patients (mean age±SD, 68.5±9.5 years, 11 male) with 17 cSDHs (measuring 13.8±4.5 mm) undergoing MMA embolization alone (8/13) or with surgical evacuation (5/13) for cSDH. There were no exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Embolization was performed via femoral access, using either liquid embolic, polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, or a combination of agents. Embolization was done either as the sole treatment or with surgical evacuation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, hematoma size at follow-up, and patient clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No procedural complications occurred. 12 patients were discharged home at baseline neurological function, and one was discharged to an aged care facility with significant disability. At follow-up (mean=8.7 weeks), combined embolization with surgical evacuation led to hematoma size reduction (14.3±2.6 mm to 5.7±6.5 mm, p<0.01), while embolization alone showed a stable hematoma size (13.3±5.7 mm to 10.0±8.8 mm, p=0.20). Recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation occurred in 2/13 (15.4%) patients, one of whom received only unilateral embolization, and the other received partial coiling due to the presence of dangerous collaterals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MMA embolization is a safe procedure that may reduce recurrence rates of cSDH when used as an adjunct to surgery or as a sole treatment. Possible reasons for treatment failure may include unilateral embolization, partial coiling, and absence of distal penetration of embolic agent. Large randomized control trials are currently in progress to assess the safety and efficacy of MMA embolization for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess recurrence rates, procedural outcomes and patient outcomes following middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Two tertiary neurosurgical referral centers in Sydney, Australia.

Participants: 13 adult patients (mean age±SD, 68.5±9.5 years, 11 male) with 17 cSDHs (measuring 13.8±4.5 mm) undergoing MMA embolization alone (8/13) or with surgical evacuation (5/13) for cSDH. There were no exclusion criteria.

Interventions: Embolization was performed via femoral access, using either liquid embolic, polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, or a combination of agents. Embolization was done either as the sole treatment or with surgical evacuation.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, hematoma size at follow-up, and patient clinical outcomes.

Results: No procedural complications occurred. 12 patients were discharged home at baseline neurological function, and one was discharged to an aged care facility with significant disability. At follow-up (mean=8.7 weeks), combined embolization with surgical evacuation led to hematoma size reduction (14.3±2.6 mm to 5.7±6.5 mm, p<0.01), while embolization alone showed a stable hematoma size (13.3±5.7 mm to 10.0±8.8 mm, p=0.20). Recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation occurred in 2/13 (15.4%) patients, one of whom received only unilateral embolization, and the other received partial coiling due to the presence of dangerous collaterals.

Conclusions: MMA embolization is a safe procedure that may reduce recurrence rates of cSDH when used as an adjunct to surgery or as a sole treatment. Possible reasons for treatment failure may include unilateral embolization, partial coiling, and absence of distal penetration of embolic agent. Large randomized control trials are currently in progress to assess the safety and efficacy of MMA embolization for this purpose.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信